ArticleKidney international reports2021
GFR Estimation After Cystatin C Reference Material Change.
Article in Kidney international reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of GFR estimation equations using creatinine, cystatin C, and their combination in pediatric hematology-oncology: no single equation is superior across subgroups.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Article
- Long-term kidney outcomes in survivors of Wilms tumor: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Article
- Acute kidney injury following treatment with CD19-specific CAR T-cell therapy in children, adolescent, and young adult patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Article
- Effect of Two Cystatin C Reagents and Four Equations on Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimations After Standardization.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2023Article
- Acute kidney injury following treatment with CD19-specific CAR T-cell therapy in children, adolescent and young adult patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Research square · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionGlomerular filtration rate (GFR) is routinely estimated with cystatin C. In June 2010, the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) released a certified cystatin C reference material (ERM-DA471/IFCC), and new cystatin C glomerular filtration rate estimation (eGFR) equations were developed with the IFCC standard. Early in 2018, Siemens discontinued their nonstandardized cystatin C reagent kits and replaced them with IFCC-calibrated kits in the US market. The aim of the current study was to assess the effect of IFCC calibration on cystatin C values and corresponding GFR estimations.
methodsCystatin C concentration was measured in 81 pediatric patients using a plasma sample from their nuclear GFR measurement with 99mTc-diethylenetriaminepentaaccetic acid. Calibration curves were generated using Siemens nonstandardized and IFCC-standardized kits to measure paired cystatin C concentrations in each sample. GFR-estimating equations using pre-IFCC and IFCC cystatin C values were compared using Bland-Altman analyses.
resultsThe IFCC-standardized assay resulted in a mean increase in the measured cystatin C value of 24%. Estimating equations consistently overestimated GFR prior to IFCC standardization. Following incorporation of the IFCC standard, the Full Age Spectrum equation demonstrated the best overall performance, whereas the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children (CKiD) equation was more accurate in children with decreased GFR.
conclusionIncorporation of the IFCC standard significantly increased cystatin C values and affected the performance of GFR estimating equations. Clinical laboratories and providers may need to update the equation used for cystatin C-based estimation of GFR following adoption of the IFCC reference standard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.