Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33614924›Full record

ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2021

Recurrent angioedema: Experience at a tertiary care urban medical center.

Suraj Kedarisetty, Derrick Tint, Alexander Michael, Ahmed M S Soliman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Medical Malpractice in the Management of Angioedema: A Multidisciplinary Westlaw Analysis.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Recurrent angioedema: Experience at a tertiary care urban medical center.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suraj KedarisettyDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5276-5414
Derrick TintDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Alexander MichaelDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Ahmed M S SolimanDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9780-2944
Temple University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the demographics, presentation, management, and outcomes of patients with recurrent angioedema. To compare the findings to patients with ACE inhibitor related angioedema.

methodsRetrospective case series with chart review of patients who presented to a tertiary-care hospital between January 2010 and December 2017 with two or more episodes of angioedema. Excluded were patients with anaphylactic reaction, medication induced angioedema, or angioedema secondary to an infectious etiology. A group of 88 patients who presented during the same time period with ACE inhibitor related angioedema was used as a control. Statistical analysis was conducted using a two-tailed Fisher exact test and a multivariate logistical regression model to determine significant associations.

resultsNinety-one patients were identified; 61 met the selection criteria and had 217 total episodes of angioedema episodes presenting to the emergency department. Fifty percent were Caucasian or Hispanic. The average number of episodes was 3.5 (range: 2-23). The lips and tongue were the most commonly affected sites (37% and 39%). The larynx and floor of mouth were least likely to be involved (7% and 6%). Only 1 patient was found to have C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency. Twenty-eight percent of patients had asthma, allergic rhinitis, food allergies, or atopic dermatitis. Only 11% of episodes required airway intervention. No patients required airway intervention after admission.

conclusionRecurrent angioedema was primarily idiopathic, was less severe than ACE inhibitor angioedema, and was associated with an atopic history. There was less frequent worsening of symptoms after admission, and recurrences occurred more frequently are at the same anatomic subsite. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Indexed as

ACE inhibitorangioedemaC1esterase inhibitorrecurrent angioedema

Identifiers

PMID33614924
PMCPMC7883605
OpenAlexW3127933851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.