Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33614764›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2021

Detection of

Philipp Vitense, Elisa Kasbohm, Anne Klassen, Peter Gierschner, Phillip Trefz, Michael Weber, Wolfram Miekisch, Jochen K Schubert, Petra Möbius, Petra Reinhold and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Detection ofSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Philipp VitenseInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Elisa KasbohmInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Anne KlassenInstitute of Molecular Pathogenesis, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Jena, Germany.
Peter GierschnerDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University Medicine Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Phillip TrefzDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University Medicine Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Michael WeberInstitute of Molecular Pathogenesis, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Jena, Germany.
Wolfram MiekischDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University Medicine Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Jochen K SchubertDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University Medicine Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Petra MöbiusNational Reference Laboratory for Paratuberculosis, Institute of Molecular Pathogenesis, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Jena, Germany.
Petra ReinholdInstitute of Molecular Pathogenesis, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Jena, Germany.
Volkmar LiebscherInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Heike KöhlerNational Reference Laboratory for Paratuberculosis, Institute of Molecular Pathogenesis, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Jena, Germany.
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DEUniversität Greifswald · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) is a novel approach to accelerate bacterial culture diagnostics of

Indexed as

bacterial culturediagnosticsmachine learningMycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosisparatuberculosisrandom forestsvariable selectionvolatile organic compound

Identifiers

PMID33614764
PMCPMC7887282
OpenAlexW3127989310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.