Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33614737›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2020

Place of Angioplasty for Coronary Artery Anomalies With Interarterial Course.

Pierre Aubry, Xavier Halna du Fretay, Olivier Boudvillain, Philippe Degrell, ANOCOR Working Group

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Percutaneous Stenting of Interarterial Left Coronary Artery Followed by Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Coronary artery disease in adults with congenital heart disease.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pierre AubryBichat Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Paris, France.
Xavier Halna du FretayPôle Santé Oréliance, Department of Cardiology, Saran, France.
Olivier BoudvillainBichat Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Paris, France.
Philippe DegrellCentre Hospitalier du Luxembourg, Institut National de Chirurgie Cardiaque et de Cardiologie Interventionnelle, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
ANOCOR Working Group
Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse · FRCentre Hospitalier de Luxembourg · LUHôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few patients with an anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) require a correction of this congenital anomaly. Current recommendations offer surgical repair as a first line therapy to prevent a sudden cardiac death as a main objective. However, these guidelines are focused on children and not based on randomized controlled studies. Furthermore, decision-making should be different in an adult population less exposed to the risk of sudden cardiac death. Current practices showed reluctance to offer a surgical treatment for right AAOCA associated with ischemic symptoms or myocardial ischemia. Our aim in this review is to expose the rationale for percutaneous coronary intervention in right AAOCA with interarterial course and to present the published results.

Indexed as

angioplastyanomalous aortic origincongenital coronary anomalyinterarterial coursestenting

Identifiers

PMID33614737
PMCPMC7893637
OpenAlexW3121659074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.