Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33614554›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2021

3D Modeling and Printing in Congenital Heart Surgery: Entering the Stage of Maturation.

Shi Joon Yoo, Nabil Hussein, Brandon Peel, John Coles, Glen S van Arsdell, Osami Honjo, Christoph Haller, Christopher Z Lam, Mike Seed, David Barron

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05852106 (The Effect of 3D Modeling on Family Quality of Life, Surgical Success and Patient Outcomes in Congenital Heart Diseases), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05852106 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of 3D Modeling on Family Quality of Life, Surgical Success and Patient Outcomes in Congenital Heart Diseases: A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorYeditepe UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsCongenital Heart DiseaseArmsSurgical Simulation with 3D Heart Model and Parental Education with "Congenital Heart Disease Parent Education Booklet" and tailored 3D Heart Modeling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shi Joon YooDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nabil HusseinCenter for Image Guided Innovation and Therapeutic Intervention, The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Brandon PeelCenter for Image Guided Innovation and Therapeutic Intervention, The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
John ColesDepartment of Surgery-Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Glen S van ArsdellDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Osami HonjoDepartment of Surgery-Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Christoph HallerDepartment of Surgery-Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Christopher Z LamDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Mike SeedDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
David BarronDepartment of Surgery-Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3D printing allows the most realistic perception of the surgical anatomy of congenital heart diseases without the requirement of physical devices such as a computer screen or virtual headset. It is useful for surgical decision making and simulation, hands-on surgical training (HOST) and cardiovascular morphology teaching. 3D-printed models allow easy understanding of surgical morphology and preoperative surgical simulation. The most common indications for its clinical use include complex forms of double outlet right ventricle and transposition of the great arteries, anomalous systemic and pulmonary venous connections, and heterotaxy. Its utility in congenital heart surgery is indisputable, although it is hard to "scientifically" prove the impact of its use in surgery because of many confounding factors that contribute to the surgical outcome. 3D-printed models are valuable resources for morphology teaching. Educational models can be produced for almost all different variations of congenital heart diseases, and replicated in any number. HOST using 3D-printed models enables efficient education of surgeons in-training. Implementation of the HOST courses in congenital heart surgical training programs is not an option but an absolute necessity. In conclusion, 3D printing is entering the stage of maturation in its use for congenital heart surgery. It is now time for imagers and surgeons to find how to effectively utilize 3D printing and how to improve the quality of the products for improved patient outcomes and impact of education and training.

Indexed as

3D modeling3D printingcongenital heart surgeryeducationhands-on surgical trainingsurgical simulation

Identifiers

PMID33614554
PMCPMC7892770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.