Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33614481›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020

Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MRI as a Prognostic Surrogate: Correlation With Breast Cancer Oncotype Dx Score.

Michelle Zhang, Meredith Sadinski, Dana Haddad, Min Sun Bae, Danny Martinez, Elizabeth A Morris, Peter Gibbs, Elizabeth J Sutton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. AI Applications to Breast MRI: Today and Tomorrow.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. New Frontiers in Breast Cancer Imaging: The Rise of AI.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Michelle ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Meredith SadinskiDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Dana HaddadDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Min Sun BaeDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Danny MartinezDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Elizabeth A MorrisDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Peter GibbsDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Elizabeth J SuttonDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USMohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences · AE

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBreast MRI background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) can potentially serve as a prognostic marker, by possible correlation with molecular subtype. Oncotype Dx, a gene assay, is a prognostic and predictive surrogate for tumor aggressiveness and treatment response. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between contralateral non-tumor breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) background parenchymal enhancement and tumor oncotype score.

methodsIn this retrospective study, patients with ER+ and HER2- early stage invasive ductal carcinoma who underwent preoperative breast MRI, oncotype risk scoring, and breast conservation surgery from 2008-2010 were identified. After registration, BPE from the pre and three post-contrast phases was automatically extracted using a k-means clustering algorithm. Four metrics were calculated: initial enhancement (IE) relative to the pre-contrast signal, late enhancement, overall enhancement (OE), and area under the enhancement curve (AUC). Histogram analysis was performed to determine first order metrics which were compared to oncotype risk score groups using Mann-Whitney tests and Spearman rank correlation analysis.

resultsThis study included 80 women (mean age = 51.1 ± 10.3 years); 46 women were categorized as low risk (≤17) and 34 women were categorized as intermediate/high risk (≥18) according to Oncotype Dx. For the mean of the top 10% pixels, significant differences were noted for IE (p = 0.032), OE (p = 0.049), and AUC (p = 0.044). Using the risk score as a continuous variable, correlation analysis revealed a weak but significant correlation with the mean of the top 10% pixels for IE (r = 0.26, p = 0.02), OE (r = 0.25, p = 0.02), and AUC (r = 0.27, p = 0.02).

conclusionBPE metrics of enhancement in the non-tumor breast are associated with tumor Oncotype Dx recurrence score, suggesting that the breast microenvironment may relate to likelihood of recurrence and magnitude of chemotherapy benefit.

Indexed as

background parenchymal enhancementbreast cancermagnetic resonance imagingoncotyperisk score

Identifiers

PMID33614481
PMCPMC7890019
OpenAlexW3129005041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.