Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33614414›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2021

Design considerations for a multiple sclerosis fatigue mobile app MS Energize: A pragmatic iterative approach using usability testing and resonance checks.

Kirsten van Kessel, Duncan R Babbage, Paula Kersten, Juliet Drown, Ann Sezier, Peter W Thomas, Sarah Thomas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Engaging the disability community in informatics research: rationales and practical steps.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kirsten van KesselAuckland University of Technology, School of Public Health and Psychosocial Studies, New Zealand.
Duncan R BabbageAuckland University of Technology, Centre for eHealth, New Zealand.
Paula KerstenRehabilitation, University of Brighton, School of Health Sciences, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Juliet DrownAuckland University of Technology, Centre for Person Centred Research, New Zealand.
Ann SezierAuckland University of Technology, Centre for Person Centred Research, New Zealand.
Peter W ThomasHealth Care Statistics and Epidemiology, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth University Clinical Research Unit, Department of Medical Science and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Sarah ThomasBournemouth University, Bournemouth University Clinical Research Unit, Department of Medical Science and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Auckland University of Technology · NZBournemouth University · GBUniversity of Brighton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurological condition affecting around 2.2 million people worldwide. The illness includes a range of symptoms, with fatigue considered to be one of the most disabling. This paper describes how a pragmatic and iterative approach, supported by usability and resonance testing, was used to build a minimum viable product of MS Energize-or MS Energise in UK English regions. MS Energise is a mobile application focused on self-management of fatigue for people with MS. The iterative approach included various stages of testing, during which user feedback including comments about interface, navigation and content, was sought to inform incremental app development and continual improvement. Usability testing was conducted with 11 people with longstanding multiple sclerosis in New Zealand and the United Kingdom, and focused on particular sections of the app as well as the accessibility of the app to users with MS. Two participants contributed to further resonance testing post-release to ensure the app was perceived as relevant and useful to the user. The usability testing and resonance testing phases suggested that user experience of MS Energise was mostly positive. Participants provided a number of suggestions for improvements to aspects of content and design; some of which we implemented during our app development process. Findings will also contribute to future planning and design iteration to enhance the user experience. The next step is further improvement of MS Energise prior to a trial of its clinical and cost effectiveness.

Indexed as

App designFatiguemHealthMultiple sclerosisUsability testing

Identifiers

PMID33614414
PMCPMC7878181
OpenAlexW3127165622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.