Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33614355›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Dilemma of Treating Psychosis Secondary to Stroke.

Ruchita Agrawal, Shikha Verma, Vatsalya Vatsalya, Monica Halappanavar, Kosisochukwu Oraka

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ruchita AgrawalPsychiatry, Seven Counties Services, Louisville, USA.
Shikha VermaPsychiatry and Behavioral Health, Rosalind Franklin University, North Chicago, USA.
Vatsalya VatsalyaMedicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, USA.
Monica HalappanavarPsychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, USA.
Kosisochukwu OrakaMedicine, Vinnytsia National Medical University, Vinnytsia, UKR.
National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsya · UASeven Counties Services · USUniversity of Louisville · USUniversity of Louisville Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-stroke psychosis is prevalent and disabling with increased mortality risk. Treatment for post-stroke psychosis is limited in this staggering medical concern. The most commonly used medications are antipsychotics, however, the risk for stroke increases further with the use of antipsychotics. Furthermore, interventional clinical studies have not been carried out to test the efficacy and safety of antipsychotics in the management of post-stroke psychosis. We present a case of post-stroke psychosis to highlight the risks faced by these patients in terms of daily function and safety concerns and the challenges encountered in treatment due to poor response to the conventional antipsychotics; and so calling attention to early diagnosis and improved treatment options. More clinical investigations are needed to address the pathology associated with the clinical presentation and exploring the pharmacotherapies to improve efficacy and safety of treatment for post-stroke psychosis.

Indexed as

long term neuropsychiatric sequelaepost stroke psychosispsychosisstroke

Identifiers

PMID33614355
PMCPMC7888683
OpenAlexW3121473911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.