ArticleCureus2021
Association of Apgar Score With Meconium Staining of Amniotic Fluid in Labor.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meconium-stained amniotic fluid and neonatal morbidity in nulliparous patients with prolonged pregnancy.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2023Trial
- First meconium passage as a predictor of early breastfeeding success in term newborns.International breastfeeding journal · 2026Article
- Determinants of low fifth minute Apgar scores among newborns at North Shoa Zone Public Hospitals in Ethiopia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Microbial Pattern in Amniotic Fluid from Women with Premature Rupture of Membranes and Meconium-Stained Fluid.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to determine the association of Apgar score with meconium staining of amniotic fluid in labor. Methodology A retrospective observational study was carried out through the non-probability convenient sampling technique at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology for a duration of six months. Only those women were selected who had more than 24 weeks of gestation period. The women were excluded on the basis of risk factors for fetal distress and breech in late labor. Results A total of 216 pregnant women were selected from the labor room in this study. The mean age of the women was 26.57±4.28 years. The gestational age of the women was 36.09±4.11 weeks. Moreover, the mean parity of pregnant women was 1.68±2.53. It has been observed that the women who had meconium staining, the neonates of 144(77.4%) women showed the Apgar score of less than six at one minute. However, for the women without meconium staining, the neonates of only 15(50%) women showed the Apgar score of less than six at the one-minute interval with a significant association (p=0.02). With respect to age groups, a significant association of meconium staining with Apgar score was noted in the 21-30 years age group, whereas, no significant association was seen in other age groups. Similarly, a significant association of meconium staining and Apgar score was noted in primiparous women, whereas, no significant association was noted in multiparous women. No significant association of Apgar score and meconium staining was seen with respect to the mode of delivery. Conclusion The study has found a relation between the Apgar score and meconium staining of amniotic fluid and reported that the Apgar score of less than six at one minute was significantly associated with meconium staining of amniotic fluid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.