ArticlePeerJ2021
Comparative analysis of the complete plastid genomes of
Article in PeerJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Genomics and Phylogenetics of Chloroplasts Reveal Lower Rates of Genetic Variation in Mango (Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Article
- Chloroplast genome characteristics and phylogenetic analysis ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025Article
- Effects of Pollen Germination and Pollen Tube Growth under Different Temperature Stresses in Mango (Metabolites · 2024Article
- Population structure and genetic diversity of mango (Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Mitochondrial genome variation and intergenomic sequence transfers inFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Vincetoxicum mongolicum (Apocynaceae), a perennial medicinal herb.Genetics and molecular biology · 2023Article
- The Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequence ofGenes · 2022Article
- Complete mitochondrial genomes of three Mangifera species, their genomic structure and gene transfer from chloroplast genomes.BMC genomics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mango is an important commercial fruit crop belonging to the genus Mangifera. In this study, we reported and compared four newly sequenced plastid genomes of the genus Mangifera, which showed high similarities in overall size (157,780-157,853 bp), genome structure, gene order, and gene content. Three mutation hotspots (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.