Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33614088›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2021

A novel approach for evaluating contact patterns and risk mitigation strategies for COVID-19 in English primary schools with application of structured expert judgement.

R S J Sparks, W P Aspinall, E Brooks-Pollock, R M Cooke, L Danon, J Barclay, J H Scarrow, J Cox

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

R S J SparksSchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7173-2899
W P AspinallSchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6014-6042
E Brooks-PollockSchool of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Office OF24, Churchill Building, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5984-4932
R M CookeResources for the Future, 1616 P St NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA.
L DanonDepartment of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Ada Lovelace Building, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7076-1871
J BarclaySchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
J H ScarrowDepartamento de Mineralogía y Petrología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.
J CoxThe Royal Society, 6-9 Carlton House Terrace, London SW7 5QR, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_19067Medical Research Council MC_PC_19067/2Medical Research Council MR/V038613/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Personal contacts drive COVID-19 infections. After being closed (23 March 2020) UK primary schools partially re-opened on 1 June 2020 with social distancing and new risk mitigation strategies. We conducted a structured expert elicitation of teachers to quantify primary school contact patterns and how contact rates changed upon re-opening with risk mitigation measures in place. These rates, with uncertainties, were determined using a performance-based algorithm. We report mean number of contacts per day for four cohorts within schools, with associated 90% confidence ranges. Prior to lockdown, younger children (Reception and Year 1) made 15 contacts per day [range 8.35] within school, older children (Year 6) 18 contacts [range 5.55], teaching staff 25 contacts [range 4.55] and non-classroom staff 11 contacts [range 2.27]. After re-opening, the mean number of contacts was reduced by 53% for young children, 62% for older children, 60% for classroom staff and 64% for other staff. Contacts between teaching and non-teaching staff reduced by 80%. The distributions of contacts per person are asymmetric with heavy tail reflecting a few individuals with high contact numbers. Questions on risk mitigation and supplementary structured interviews elucidated how new measures reduced daily contacts in-school and contribute to infection risk reduction.

Indexed as

COVID19expert judgementschoolstransmission

Identifiers

PMID33614088
PMCPMC7890480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.