ArticleRoyal Society open science2021
Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal
Article in Royal Society open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Landscape of 2D Deep Learning Segmentation Networks Applied to CT Scan from Lung Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Incentivising research data sharing: a scoping review.Wellcome open research · 2021Pooled it
- Evaluating the reproducibility and verifiability of nutrition research: a case study of studies assessing the relationship between potatoes and colorectal cancer.Nutrition & diabetes · 2026Review
- Introducing the Truth Effect Database (TED): An open trial-level resource promoting FAIR data in truth effect research.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Open science practices in personality disorder journals.Personality disorders · 2026Article
- Psychometric structure and score interpretation of the SCL-90 among Chinese first-year undergraduates: an analysis of an open dataset.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The struggle to make transparency mainstream: initial evidence for a slow uptake of open science practices in PhD theses.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- A sharing practices review of the visual search and eye movements literature reveals recommendations for our field and others.Behavior research methods · 2025Review
- Open science interventions to improve reproducibility and replicability of research: a scoping review.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Provide proactive reproducible analysis transparency with every publication.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review.Royal Society open science · 2025Review
- Evaluating the Reproducibility and Verifiability of Nutrition Research: A Case Study of Studies Assessing the Relationship Between Potatoes and Colorectal Cancer.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Assessing computational reproducibility in Behavior Research Methods.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Opening the black box of article retractions: exploring the causes and consequences of data management errors.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Editorial for Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- Promoting Data Sharing: The Moral Obligations of Public Funding Agencies.Science and engineering ethics · 2024Article
- Measuring transparency in the social sciences: political science and international relations.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Expanding the data Ark: an attempt to make the data from highly cited social science papers publicly available.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- What do meta-analysts need in primary studies? Guidelines and the SEMI checklist for facilitating cumulative knowledge.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For any scientific report, repeating the original analyses upon the original data should yield the original outcomes. We evaluated analytic reproducibility in 25
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.