Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33614059›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2021

Influenza spread on context-specific networks lifted from interaction-based diary data.

Kristina Mallory, Joshua Rubin Abrams, Anne Schwartz, Maria-Veronica Ciocanel, Alexandria Volkening, Björn Sandstede

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kristina MalloryDivision of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Joshua Rubin AbramsDepartment of Mathematics, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Anne SchwartzAmazon, Seattle, WA, USA.
Maria-Veronica CiocanelDepartment of Mathematics and Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6859-4659
Alexandria VolkeningNSF-Simons Center for Quantitative Biology, and Department of Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3401-5094
Björn SandstedeDivision of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5432-1235

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studying the spread of infections is an important tool in limiting or preventing future outbreaks. A first step in understanding disease dynamics is constructing networks that reproduce features of real-world interactions. In this paper, we generate networks that maintain some features of the partial interaction networks that were recorded in an existing diary-based survey at the University of Warwick. To preserve realistic structure in our artificial networks, we use a context-specific approach. In particular, we propose different algorithms for producing larger home, work and social networks. Our networks are able to maintain much of the interaction structure in the original diary-based survey and provide a means of accounting for the interactions of survey participants with non-participants. Simulating a discrete susceptible-infected-recovered model on the full network produces epidemic behaviour which shares characteristics with previous influenza seasons. Our approach allows us to explore how disease transmission and dynamic responses to infection differ depending on interaction context. We find that, while social interactions may be the first to be reduced after influenza infection, limiting work and school encounters may be significantly more effective in controlling the overall severity of the epidemic.

Indexed as

disease spreaddynamic networkinfluenzasocial distancesusceptible–infected–recovered model

Identifiers

PMID33614059
PMCPMC7890481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.