Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33614003›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2021

Rise and fall of †Pycnodontiformes: Diversity, competition and extinction of a successful fish clade.

John J Cawley, Giuseppe Marramà, Giorgio Carnevale, Jaime A Villafaña, Faviel A López-Romero, Jürgen Kriwet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Alternating regimes of shallow and deep-sea diversification explain a species-richness paradox in marine fishes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Fossilized cell structures identify an ancient origin for the teleost whole-genome duplication.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

John J CawleyFaculty of Earth Science, Geography and Astronomy Department of Palaeontology University of Vienna Geozentrum Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3703-4138
Giuseppe MarramàDipartimento di Scienze della Terra Università degli Studi di Torino Torino Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7856-5605
Giorgio CarnevaleDipartimento di Scienze della Terra Università degli Studi di Torino Torino Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3433-4127
Jaime A VillafañaFaculty of Earth Science, Geography and Astronomy Department of Palaeontology University of Vienna Geozentrum Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6441-9025
Faviel A López-RomeroFaculty of Earth Science, Geography and Astronomy Department of Palaeontology University of Vienna Geozentrum Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6500-0747
Jürgen KriwetFaculty of Earth Science, Geography and Astronomy Department of Palaeontology University of Vienna Geozentrum Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6439-8455

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 29796
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

†Pycnodontiformes was a successful lineage of primarily marine fishes that broadly diversified during the Mesozoic. They possessed a wide variety of body shapes and were adapted to a broad range of food sources. Two other neopterygian clades possessing similar ecological adaptations in both body morphology (†Dapediiformes) and dentition (Ginglymodi) also occurred in Mesozoic seas. Although these groups occupied the same marine ecosystems, the role that competitive exclusion and niche partitioning played in their ability to survive alongside each other remains unknown. Using geometric morphometrics on both the lower jaw (as constraint for feeding adaptation) and body shape (as constraint for habitat adaptation), we show that while dapediiforms and ginglymodians occupy similar lower jaw morphospace, pycnodontiforms are completely separate. Separation also occurs between the clades in body shape so that competition reduction between pycnodontiforms and the other two clades would have resulted in niche partitioning. Competition within pycnodontiforms seemingly was reduced further by evolving different feeding strategies as shown by disparate jaw shapes that also indicate high levels of plasticity. Acanthomorpha was a teleostean clade that evolved later in the Mesozoic and which has been regarded as implicated in driving the pycnodontiforms to extinction. Although they share similar body shapes, no coeval acanthomorphs had similar jaw shapes or dentitions for dealing with hard prey like pycnodontiforms do and so their success being a factor in pycnodontiform extinction is unlikely. Sea surface temperature and eustatic variations also had no impact on pycnodontiform diversity patterns according to our results. Conversely, the occurrence and number of available reefs and hardgrounds as habitats through time seems to be the main factor in pycnodontiform success. Decline in such habitats during the Late Cretaceous and Palaeogene might have had deleterious consequences for pycnodontiform diversity. Acanthomorphs occupied the niches of pycnodontiforms during the terminal phase of their existence.

Indexed as

competitiondiversityextinctionmorphospace analysisniche partitioningPycnodontiformes

Identifiers

PMID33614003
PMCPMC7882952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.