Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33613631›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2021

Transcriptomics of Biostimulation of Plants Under Abiotic Stress.

Susana González-Morales, Susana Solís-Gaona, Marin Virgilio Valdés-Caballero, Antonio Juárez-Maldonado, Araceli Loredo-Treviño, Adalberto Benavides-Mendoza

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Molecular Basis and Mechanistic Insights intoPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. ACurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Identification of the KNOX Gene Family inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Impact ofPeerJ · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Improving Rice Leaf Shape Using CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Susana González-MoralesCONACYT-Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Saltillo, Mexico.
Susana Solís-GaonaUPL, Saltillo, Mexico.
Marin Virgilio Valdés-CaballeroUPL, Saltillo, Mexico.
Antonio Juárez-MaldonadoDepartamento de Botánica, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Saltillo, Mexico.
Araceli Loredo-TreviñoDepartamento de Alimentos, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Saltillo, Mexico.
Adalberto Benavides-MendozaDepartamento de Horticultura, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Saltillo, Mexico.
Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro · MXInstituto Tecnológico de Saltillo · MXUniversidad Autónoma de Coahuila · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant biostimulants are compounds, living microorganisms, or their constituent parts that alter plant development programs. The impact of biostimulants is manifested in several ways: via morphological, physiological, biochemical, epigenomic, proteomic, and transcriptomic changes. For each of these, a response and alteration occur, and these alterations in turn improve metabolic and adaptive performance in the environment. Many studies have been conducted on the effects of different biotic and abiotic stimulants on plants, including many crop species. However, as far as we know, there are no reviews available that describe the impact of biostimulants for a specific field such as transcriptomics, which is the objective of this review. For the commercial registration process of products for agricultural use, it is necessary to distinguish the specific impact of biostimulants from that of other legal categories of products used in agriculture, such as fertilizers and plant hormones. For the chemical or biological classification of biostimulants, the classification is seen as a complex issue, given the great diversity of compounds and organisms that cause biostimulation. However, with an approach focused on the impact on a particular field such as transcriptomics, it is perhaps possible to obtain a criterion that allows biostimulants to be grouped considering their effects on living systems, as well as the overlap of the impact on metabolism, physiology, and morphology occurring between fertilizers, hormones, and biostimulants.

Indexed as

chitosangene expressionhumic acidmacroalgaepeptidesPGPRsseleniumsilicon

Identifiers

PMID33613631
PMCPMC7888440
OpenAlexW3126710323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.