ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021
Resolving Recalcitrant Clades in the Pantropical Ochnaceae: Insights From Comparative Phylogenomics of Plastome and Nuclear Genomic Data Derived From Targeted Sequencing.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A global phylogenetic framework for Diospyros L. (Ebenaceae, Ericales): enhanced taxon and sample coverage through NGS, Sanger sequencing and herbariomics.Annals of botany · 2026Article
- Taxonomic Studies on 10 Species Within the GenusEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Phylogenomics, ecomorphological evolution, and historical biogeography in Deuterocohnia (Bromeliaceae: Pitcairnioideae).American journal of botany · 2026Article
- The origin and diversification of Amaryllidaceae: A phylogenetic and biogeographic analysis.American journal of botany · 2025Article
- Complete chloroplast genomes of 13 species of the Impatiens genus for genomic features and phylogenetic relationships studies.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Genome skimming provides evidence to accept two new genera (Apiaceae) separated from theFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Plastid phylogenomics contributes to the taxonomic revision of taxa within the genusFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Phylogeny, adaptive evolution, and taxonomy ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Article
- New Insights Into The Evolution of Chloroplast Genomes inEvolutionary bioinformatics online · 2023Article
- Plastid Phylogenomics Provide Evidence to Accept Two New Members ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- The complete plastomes of seven Peucedanum plants: comparative and phylogenetic analyses for the Peucedanum genus.BMC plant biology · 2022Article
- Highly Resolved Papilionoid Legume Phylogeny Based on Plastid Phylogenomics.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Developing Asparagaceae1726: An Asparagaceae-specific probe set targeting 1726 loci for Hyb-Seq and phylogenomics in the family.Applications in plant sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plastid DNA sequence data have been traditionally widely used in plant phylogenetics because of the high copy number of plastids, their uniparental inheritance, and the blend of coding and non-coding regions with divergent substitution rates that allow the reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships at different taxonomic ranks. In the present study, we evaluate the utility of the plastome for the reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships in the pantropical plant family Ochnaceae (Malpighiales). We used the off-target sequence read fraction of a targeted sequencing study (targeting nuclear loci only) to recover more than 100 kb of the plastid genome from the majority of the more than 200 species of Ochnaceae and all but two genera using
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.