ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2021
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dual legacy of plant water-deficit-tolerance and watering history shapes rhizosphere microbial transplant outcomes in tomato post-drought recovery.Environmental microbiome · 2026Article
- Environmental effects on constructed wetland microbial diversity and function in the context of wastewater management.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Kerogen-rich rocks influence growth and composition of an anaerobic microbial community.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Diversity of microbial, biocontrol agents and nematode abundance on a susceptibleFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Interkingdom interaction: the soil isopod Porcellio scaber stimulates the methane-driven bacterial and fungal interaction.ISME communications · 2023Article
- Article
- Distribution of CRISPR-Cas systems in the Burkholderiaceae family and its biological implications.Archives of microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cryoturbated peat circles (pH 4) in the Eastern European Tundra harbor up to 2 mM pore water nitrate and emit the greenhouse gas N
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.