Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33613354›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020

Online and Face-to-Face Performance on Two Cognitive Tasks in Children With Williams Syndrome.

Maria Ashworth, Olympia Palikara, Elizabeth Burchell, Harry Purser, Dritan Nikolla, Jo Van Herwegen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Computerized Cognitive Test Batteries for Children and Adolescents-A Scoping Review of Tools For Lab- and Web-Based Settings From 2000 to 2021.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria AshworthDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Olympia PalikaraDepartment of Education Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth BurchellDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Harry PurserDepartment of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Dritan NikollaDepartment of Psychology, Kingston University, Kingston upon Thames, United Kingdom.
Jo Van HerwegenDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been an increase in cognitive assessment via the Internet, especially since the coronavirus disease 2019 surged the need for remote psychological assessment. This is the first study to investigate the appropriability of conducting cognitive assessments online with children with a neurodevelopmental condition and intellectual disability, namely, Williams syndrome. This study compared Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices (RCPM) and British Picture Vocabulary Scale (BPVS) scores from two different groups of children with WS age 10-11 years who were assessed online (

Indexed as

British Picture Vocabulary Scale 3 (BPVS3)cognitive assessmentface-to-face assessmentonline assessmentRaven’s Colored Progressive MatricesWilliams syndrome

Identifiers

PMID33613354
PMCPMC7889503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.