ArticleFrontiers in physiology2021
Current Predictive Resting Metabolic Rate Equations Are Not Sufficient to Determine Proper Resting Energy Expenditure in Olympic Young Adult National Team Athletes.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Accuracy of Resting Metabolic Rate Prediction Equations in Athletes: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Pooled it
- Article
- Article
- Low Energy Availability and Its Impact on Bone Health and Metabolism in Athletes: A Narrative Review.Physiological research · 2025Review
- Optimizing Performance Nutrition for Adolescent Athletes: A Review of Dietary Needs, Risks, and Practical Strategies.Nutrients · 2025Review
- New Bioelectrical Impedance-Based Equations to Estimate Resting Metabolic Rate in Young Athletes.Methods and protocols · 2025Article
- Proposed shorter duration protocols for measuring resting energy expenditure utilizing whole-room indirect calorimetry.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2025Article
- Comparison between Measured and Predicted Resting Metabolic Rate Equations in Cross-Training Practitioners.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Validity of predictive equations for total energy expenditure against doubly labeled water.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The Development of a Resting Metabolic Rate Prediction Equation for Professional Male Rugby Union Players.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Predicting resting energy expenditure among athletes: a systematic review.Biology of sport · 2023Review
- Reliability of resting metabolic rate between and within day measurements using the Vyntus CPX system and comparison against predictive formulas.Nutrition and health · 2023Article
- Accuracy of Resting Metabolic Rate Prediction Equations in Sport Climbers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predictive resting metabolic rate (RMR) equations are widely used to determine athletes' resting energy expenditure (REE). However, it remains unclear whether these predictive RMR equations accurately predict REE in the athletic populations. The purpose of the study was to compare 12 prediction equations (Harris-Benedict, Mifflin, Schofield, Cunningham, Owen, Liu's, De Lorenzo) with measured RMR in Turkish national team athletes and sedentary controls. A total of 97 participants, 49 athletes (24 females, 25 males), and 48 sedentary (28 females, 20 males), were recruited from Turkey National Olympic Teams at the Ministry of Youth and Sports. RMR was measured using a Fitmate GS (Cosmed, Italy). The results of each 12 prediction formulas were compared with the measured RMR using paired
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.