Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33613150›Full record

ArticleAdvanced functional materials2021

3D Bioprinting using UNIversal Orthogonal Network (UNION) Bioinks.

Sarah M Hull, Christopher D Lindsay, Lucia G Brunel, Daniel J Shiwarski, Joshua W Tashman, Julien G Roth, David Myung, Adam W Feinberg, Sarah C Heilshorn

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced functional materials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Omnidirectional 3D Printing of Anisotropic Nanofibrous Peptide Hydrogels.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Diffusion-Based 3D Bioprinting Strategies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah M HullDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Christopher D LindsayDepartment of Materials Science & Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Lucia G BrunelDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Daniel J ShiwarskiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Joshua W TashmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Julien G RothInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
David MyungDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Adam W FeinbergDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Sarah C HeilshornDepartment of Materials Science & Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Stanford University · USCarnegie Mellon University · USCalifornia Institute for Regenerative Medicine · USVA Palo Alto Health Care System · US

Funding

Stanford/UNC Biomimetic U19 Research CenterU19AI116484 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2015 to 2025
$13.5M
Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN A BACCUS · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
Advanced Manufacturing of Regenerative Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds R01FD006582 · FDA · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI BADYLAK, STEPHEN F., FEINBERG, ADAM WALTER · 2018 to 2020
$1.8M
Engineered matrix microarrays to enhance the regenerative potential of iPSC-derived endothelial cellsR01HL142718 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HEILSHORN, SARAH C, HUANG, NGAN F. · 2018 to 2021
$1.6M
Engineered biomaterials to modulate cell-cell signaling for the robust expansion of stem cellsR01EB027171 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HEILSHORN, SARAH C · 2019 to 2022
$1.4M
In Situ Bioconjugation as a Therapeutic Delivery Modality to Enhance Ocular Wound HealingK08EY028176 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MYUNG, DAVID · 2017 to 2021
$1.1M
Characterization of corneal stromal stem cells encapsulated within bioorthogonally crosslinked collagen gels for delivery to the ocular surfaceF31EY030731 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HULL, SARAH · 2019 to 2022
$131k
Mapping 3D Mechanical Strains During Embryonic Heart Formation to Improve the Structure and Function of Engineered Human Heart MuscleF32HL142229 · NHLBI · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI SHIWARSKI, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2019
$120k
Corneal Reconstruction through an In Situ-Forming Collagen GelI21RX003179 · VA · VETERANS ADMIN PALO ALTO HEALTH CARE SYS · PI MYUNG, DAVID · 2019 to 2021
–
FDA HHS R01 FD006582NEI NIH HHS F31 EY030731NEI NIH HHS K08 EY028176NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL142229NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL142718NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI116484NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027171RRD VA I21 RX003179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is a promising technology to produce tissue-like structures, but a lack of diversity in bioinks is a major limitation. Ideally each cell type would be printed in its own customizable bioink. To fulfill this need for a universally applicable bioink strategy, we developed a versatile, bioorthogonal bioink crosslinking mechanism that is cell compatible and works with a range of polymers. We term this family of materials UNIversal, Orthogonal Network (UNION) bioinks. As demonstration of UNION bioink versatility, gelatin, hyaluronic acid (HA), recombinant elastin-like protein (ELP), and polyethylene glycol (PEG) were each used as backbone polymers to create inks with storage moduli spanning 200 to 10,000 Pa. Because UNION bioinks are crosslinked by a common chemistry, multiple materials can be printed together to form a unified, cohesive structure. This approach is compatible with any support bath that enables diffusion of UNION crosslinkers. Both matrix-adherent human corneal mesenchymal stromal cells and non-matrix-adherent human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural progenitor spheroids were printed with UNION bioinks. The cells retained high viability and expressed characteristic phenotypic markers after printing. Thus, UNION bioinks are a versatile strategy to expand the toolkit of customizable materials available for 3D bioprinting.

Indexed as

3D bioprintingbioinkbiomaterialsbioorthogonal chemistry

Identifiers

PMID33613150
PMCPMC7888563
OpenAlexW3110643525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.