ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India2021
Effectiveness of reflective learning in skill-based teaching among postgraduate anesthesia students: An outcome-based study using video annotation tool.
Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical education all over the world is undergoing paradigm shift. Video recording of student's performance and self-annotation are emerging as valuable tools for self-directed learning among students. Study was conducted to find the effectiveness of video annotation tool in reflective learning. The learning outcome was to find whether the video annotation is helping in critical reflection and improving the perception of students on guideline compliance while learning the technique of epidural insertion.
methodsIn phase 1; following pretest, the students were made to observe three epidural insertions and perform one epidural insertion. In phase 2; following posttest, two faculty members analyzed the depth of reflection using the Reflection Rubric. Students perception was recorded using the Reflective practice survey.
resultsThe average score of students after pretest was 76%. The posttest score was 84% (p value 0.003). In depth analysis using the reflection rubric we found 52.38% of the total reflections had a score of two, showing they were at introspection level only. 25.71% of reflections were having score of one, showing that they were just habitual answers. Only 21.9% of the total reflections had score of three; and none of them were critically reflecting. All the students (18/18) agreed that recording the session was meaningful.
conclusionThe art of critical reflection is learnt by relentless effort. Yet it helps the students to reflect on the whole process introspecting and understanding what went wrong. Video annotation turns out to be a valuable tool in reflective learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.