Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33612946›Full record

ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India2021

One-month long foundation course for newly joined Indian medical undergraduates: Faculty and students' perspective.

Arvind Kumar Pandey, Sushma Prabhath, Kirtana R Nayak, Lydia Andrade, Krishnananda Prabhu, Veena Nayak, Sneha G Kalthur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Reconsidering the Family Adoption Programme in Medical Education: A Call for Alternative Approaches to Community-based Learning.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arvind Kumar PandeyAssociate Professor (Anatomy) & Faculty (Medical Education), Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Sushma PrabhathAssistant Professor (Anatomy), Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Kirtana R NayakProfessor (Physiology) & Head (Medical Education), Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Lydia AndradeAssistant Professor (Anatomy), Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Krishnananda PrabhuProfessor (Biochemistry) & Faculty (Medical Education), Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Veena NayakAssociate Professor (Pharmacology) & Faculty (Medical Education), Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Sneha G KalthurProfessor (Anatomy), Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA one-month long foundation course has been introduced at the entry-level for first-year MBBS (Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery) students in the medical institutions across India from 2019. Therefore, the present study is aimed at describing the experience of implementing a one-month long foundation course conducted for the Competency-based Undergraduate Medical Curriculum (CBUC) of Indian Medical Graduate as per the guidelines from the National Medical Commission (NMC) (erstwhile Medical Council of India, MCI). We have evaluated the student and faculty perceptions towards the effectiveness of the program.

methodsThe foundation course had six modules Orientation, Skills, Field visit to Community Health Centre, Professional Development including Ethics, Sports and Extracurricular activities, Computer Skills, and Language enhancement program. Regular feedback wascollected from students (N = 250) and teachers (N = 26) involved in the Foundation course using a semi-structured questionnaire. The program's overall feedback was also obtained at the end of the course, using a validated questionnaire. The quantitative findings were expressed in frequency and percentage. The qualitative observations (reflections of students and faculty) were subjected to thematic.

resultsThe students and faculty appreciated the one-month long foundation course. The course's defined objectives were met as indicated by most students (98.4%) and faculty (75%). The course seemed to be useful for students to embark on a formal MBBS curriculum. It also exposed them to new knowledge and practices, as indicated by the feedback. Thematic analysis of the students' and faculty's reflections was carried out and two themes were identified, i.e., 'strengths' and 'challenges.' The Foundation Course Committee will work out appropriate remedial measures to overcome the challenges in the future sessions for subsequent batches.

conclusionsThe one-month-long foundation course was found to be beneficial for newly joined students to get introduced and adjusted to higher education systems' demands. Also, the challenges faced during the program needs to be addressed with suitable remedial measures while implementing for subsequent batches. This effort will ensure a smooth conduct of the foundation course for the future batches of medical undergraduates and make the program more effective.

Indexed as

Competency-based undergraduate medical curriculum (CBUC)Educational moduleFoundation courseTeaching-learningUndergraduate medical students

Identifiers

PMID33612946
PMCPMC7873752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.