ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India2021
Development and validation of a structured feedback questionnaire from postgraduates on various elements of postgraduate medical curriculum.
Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Curriculum Implementation for the Medical Laboratory Technology Programme at an Allied Health School: A Case of Uganda Institute of Allied Health and Management Sciences.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- Feedback Framework in Psychiatry Residency Training: A Cross-sectional Survey Amongst Psychiatry Post-graduate Residents of India.Indian journal of psychological medicine · 2025Article
- Factor analysis validation of the student feedback questionnaire for the subcutaneous swelling simulation model.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
- Translation and Validation of a Persian Version of the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency Questionnaire (SRI).Tanaffos · 2024Article
- A survey of attitudes towards the curriculum for clinical medicine postgraduates pursuing professional master's degrees: perspectives of supervisors and students.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Learning needs of nursing postgraduates in Southwest China based on Hutchinson's learning needs theory: a qualitative research.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Effect of Bhramari Pranayama intervention on stress, anxiety, depression and sleep quality among COVID 19 patients in home isolation.Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicineArticle
- Validation of Expanded form of Lubben Social Network Scale among Community-Dwelling Geriatric Population in India.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social MedicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical Council of India, introduced the Post Graduate (PG) curriculum as 'Competency Based Medical Education' (CBME). Feedback from the end users is a vital step in curriculum evaluation. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to develop and validate a Structured Feedback Questionnaire (SFQ) for postgraduates, encompassing all the components of the PG-CBME curriculum.
methodsSFQ was developed with 23 Likert based questions and four open ended questions. Content validation was done by Lawshe method. After getting institutional ethics clearance and informed consent, SFQ was administered to 121 final year PGs (response rate 100%). We performed Principal component analysis (PCA), Structural equation modeling (SEM), Chi squared test (χ
resultsThe validation resulted in a three-factor model comprising of "curriculum" (42.1%), "assessment" (28%), and "support" (18.5%). Chi squared test (χ
conclusionWe believe that this 23 item SFQ is a valid and reliable tool which can be utilized for curriculum evaluation and thereby formulating recommendations to modify the existing curriculum wherever required, facilitating enriched program outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.