Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33612345›Full record

ArticlePatient education and counseling2021

Risk perceptions of COVID-19 and its impact on precautionary behavior: A qualitative study.

Mohammed M J Alqahtani, Boshra A Arnout, Fahmi Hassan Fadhel, Nabil Saleh SLeh Sufyan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient education and counseling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effective Model of Emerging Disease Prevention and Control in a High-Epidemic Area, Chiang Rai Province.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mental Models of Illness during the Early Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammed M J AlqahtaniDepartment of Psychology, King Khalid University, Abha City, Saudi Arabia. Electronic address: mmjbhhal@gmail.com.
Boshra A ArnoutDepartment of Psychology, King Khalid University, Abha City, Saudi Arabia; Department of Psychology, Zagazig University, Zagazig City, Egypt.
Fahmi Hassan FadhelDepartment of Psychology, King Khalid University, Abha City, Saudi Arabia; Department of Psychology, Hodeidah University, Hodeidah City, Yemen.
Nabil Saleh SLeh SufyanDepartment of Psychology, King Khalid University, Abha City, Saudi Arabia; Department of Psychology, Taiz University, Taiz City, Yemen.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe controlling of the COVID-19 pandemic is influenced by the precautionary behavior of the community, and such behavior is frequently related to individuals' risk perception. The current study aimed to explore risk perceptions and precautionary behavior in response to COVID-19.

methodQualitative in-depth interviews by telephone were undertaken with 26 participants from three affected cities in an initial stage of the disease outbreak, from May 3 to June 5, 2020. The method of analyzing data was inductive. The results were analyzed using interpretation, categorizing, and thematic analysis.

resultsThe perception of risk is influenced by numerous individual, community, and cultural factors; these perceptions act as triggers for precautionary behavior, with a tendency to deny risks or react with exaggeration in terms of the precautionary reactions related to COVID-19. The thematic analysis produced two major categories: 1) risk perception and 2) precautionary behavior. The analysis provides essential insight into risk perception and precautionary behavior.

conclusionThe risk perceptions and patterns of precautionary behavior could be unreliable, unhealthy, and culturally affected, which would influence the effectiveness of pandemic control measures. Further investigations with more data and including risk perception and precautionary behavior in the national response plan for emergency and crisis are highly recommended. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: A greater understanding and ongoing assessment of COVID-19 risk perception could inform policymakers and health professionals who seek to promote precautionary behavior. This could also facilitate early interventions during pandemics.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPerceptionSARS-CoV-2Community disastersHealth behaviorPrevention and controlPsychology of crisisPublic health

Identifiers

PMID33612345
PMCPMC7882911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.