Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33611997›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2021

The neural basis of ideological differences in race categorization.

Amy R Krosch, John T Jost, Jay J Van Bavel

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Political games of attack and defence.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  4. The cognitive and perceptual correlates of ideological attitudes: a data-driven approach.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  5. Reframing social categorization as latent structure learning for understanding political behaviour.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Computational and neurocognitive approaches to the political brain: key insights and future avenues for political neuroscience.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amy R KroschDepartment of Psychology, Cornell University, 211 Uris Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
John T JostDepartment of Psychology, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Jay J Van BavelDepartment of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiracial individuals are often categorized as members of their 'socially subordinate' racial group-a form of social discrimination termed hypodescent-with political conservatives more likely than liberals to show this bias. Although hypodescent has been linked to racial hierarchy preservation motives, it remains unclear

Indexed as

MotivationPoliticsSocial PerceptionBrainFaceFemaleHumansMaleNew YorkYoung Adultambiguityanterior insulahypodescentneuroimagingpolitical ideologyrace categorization

Identifiers

PMID33611997
PMCPMC7934910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.