Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33611990›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2021

Political games of attack and defence.

Carsten K W De Dreu, Ruthie Pliskin, Michael Rojek-Giffin, Zsombor Méder, Jörg Gross

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Environmental stress increases out-group aggression and intergroup conflict in humans.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  4. Intergroup conflict: origins, dynamics and consequences across taxa.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Political ideology, cooperation and national parochialism across 42 nations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  6. Computational and neurocognitive approaches to the political brain: key insights and future avenues for political neuroscience.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carsten K W De DreuSocial, Economic and Organizational Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ruthie PliskinSocial, Economic and Organizational Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Michael Rojek-GiffinSocial, Economic and Organizational Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Zsombor MéderSocial, Economic and Organizational Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jörg GrossSocial, Economic and Organizational Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Political conflicts often revolve around changing versus defending a

Indexed as

Conflict, PsychologicalGame TheoryPoliticsBrainHumansProbabilitycognitive controlcontest theorydecision-makingideologyperspective takingpolarization

Identifiers

PMID33611990
PMCPMC7934902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.