ArticleOral radiology2021
Computed tomography texture analysis of mandibular condylar bone marrow in diabetes mellitus patients.
Article in Oral radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative computed tomography texture analysis of changes in the mandibular condyle associated with orthognathic surgery.Oral radiology · 2026Article
- Quantitative Imaging of the Mandibular Condyle: Radiomics and Microarchitectural Biomarkers.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2026Review
- Quantitative CT texture analysis of the mandibular condyle in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw.Polish journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Integration of texture analysis based on DCE-MRI KBMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Radiomics in bone pathology of the jaws.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2023Article
- Texture analysis of low-flow vascular malformations in the oral and maxillofacial region: venous malformation vs. lymphatic malformation.Polish journal of radiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesDiabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with a broad range of complications, such as retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy, and cardiovascular disease. Therefore, predicting DM from head and neck images is a challenge for clinicians. The purpose of this study was to assess the mandibular condylar bone marrow in DM patients using computed tomography (CT) texture analysis.
methodsThis retrospective study included 16 DM and age and sex matched 16 control patients (11 men, 5 women; mean age, 56.8 ± 14.4 years; range 31-78 years). Patients with Type I DM, prior history of taking bisphosphonates, osteoarthritis of the temporomandibular joint, and CT images with metal artifacts were excluded from this study. Bilateral mandibular condylar bone marrow was manually contoured on axial CT images. The presence or absence of DM is the primary predictor variable. Texture features of the region of interest was the outcome variable, that were analyzed using an open-access software, MaZda Ver.3.3. For each group, 20 features out of 279 parameters were selected with Fisher, probability of error and average correlation coefficient methods in MaZda. Bivariate statistics were computed with the Mann-Whitney U test and the P value was set at .05.
resultsOne histogram feature, 15 Gy level co-occurrence matrix features, and four gray level run length matrix features showed differences between the DM patients and non-DM patients (P < 0.05).
conclusionsSeveral texture features of the condyle demonstrated differences between the DM and non-DM patients. CT texture analysis may potentially detect DM from the condylar bone marrow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.