Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33611664›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2021

Performance of a novel protease-activated fluorescent imaging system for intraoperative detection of residual breast cancer during breast conserving surgery.

Conor R Lanahan, Bridget N Kelly, Michele A Gadd, Michelle C Specht, Carson L Brown, Kevin S Hughes, Rong Tang, Upahvan Rai, Elena F Brachtel, Travis Rice-Stitt and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. A Cathepsin-Targeted Quenched Activity-Based Probe Facilitates Enhanced Detection of Human Tumors during Resection.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Conor R LanahanDivision of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH Center for Breast Cancer, Yawkey 9A, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Bridget N KellyDivision of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH Center for Breast Cancer, Yawkey 9A, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Michele A GaddDivision of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH Center for Breast Cancer, Yawkey 9A, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Michelle C SpechtDivision of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH Center for Breast Cancer, Yawkey 9A, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Carson L BrownDivision of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH Center for Breast Cancer, Yawkey 9A, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Kevin S HughesDivision of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH Center for Breast Cancer, Yawkey 9A, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Rong TangDivision of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH Center for Breast Cancer, Yawkey 9A, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Upahvan RaiDivision of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH Center for Breast Cancer, Yawkey 9A, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Elena F BrachtelDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Travis Rice-StittDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Barbara L SmithDivision of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH Center for Breast Cancer, Yawkey 9A, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA. blsmith1@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4281-665X

Funding

A prospective, multi-center pivotal study of the LUM Imaging System for real-time, in vivo margin assessment in breast conserving surgeryR44CA211013 · NCI · LUMICELL, INC. · PI LEE, W. DAVID · 2016 to 2017
$2.0M
Phase II clinical study of real-time tumor bed imaging in breast cancer patientsR21CA173762 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SMITH, BARBARA LYNN · 2013 to 2014
$512k
NCI NIH HHS 1R21CA173762-01NCI NIH HHS 1R44CA211013-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSafe breast cancer lumpectomies require microscopically clear margins. Real-time margin assessment options are limited, and 20-40% of lumpectomies have positive margins requiring re-excision. The LUM Imaging System previously showed excellent sensitivity and specificity for tumor detection during lumpectomy surgery. We explored its impact on surgical workflow and performance across patient and tumor types.

methodsWe performed IRB-approved, prospective, non-randomized studies in breast cancer lumpectomy procedures. The LUM Imaging System uses LUM015, a protease-activated fluorescent imaging agent that identifies residual tumor in the surgical cavity walls. Fluorescent cavity images were collected in real-time and analyzed using system software.

resultsCavity and specimen images were obtained in 55 patients injected with LUM015 at 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg and in 5 patients who did not receive LUM015. All tumor types were distinguished from normal tissue, with mean tumor:normal (T:N) signal ratios of 3.81-5.69. T:N ratios were 4.45 in non-dense and 4.00 in dense breasts (p = 0.59) and 3.52 in premenopausal and 4.59 in postmenopausal women (p = 0.19). Histopathology and tumor receptor testing were not affected by LUM015. Falsely positive readings were more likely when tumor was present < 2 mm from the adjacent specimen margin. LUM015 signal was stable in vivo at least 6.5 h post injection, and ex vivo at least 4 h post excision.

conclusionsIntraoperative use of the LUM Imaging System detected all breast cancer subtypes with robust performance independent of menopausal status and breast density. There was no significant impact on histopathology or receptor evaluation.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMastectomy, SegmentalFemaleHumansNeoplasm, ResidualPeptide HydrolasesProspective StudiesReoperationPeptide HydrolasesImage-guided surgeryIntraoperative tumor detectionLumpectomyMargin assessment

Identifiers

PMID33611664
PMCPMC8062324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.