ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2021
ARthroscopy in Knee OsteoArthritis (ARK-OA): a multicentre study assessing compliance to national guidelines.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidence of Total Knee Arthroplasty After Arthroscopic Surgery for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Osteoarthritis: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.MedComm · 2026Review
- A tailored intervention does not reduce low value MRI's and arthroscopies in degenerative knee disease when the secular time trend is taken into account: a difference-in-difference analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022Article
- Therapeutic applications of adipose-derived stromal vascular fractions in osteoarthritis.World journal of stem cells · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe use of arthroscopy to alleviate the symptoms of osteoarthritis has been questioned by recent high quality evidence. This has led to the development of guidelines by specialist and national bodies advocating against its use.
aimsTo examine the trends of the rates of arthroscopy in patients with knee osteoarthritis over the past five years and determining compliance with guidelines.
methodsMulti-centre, retrospective audit in five hospital trusts in the United Kingdom. The number of arthroscopies performed by month from 2013 to 2017 was identified through hospital coding. Fifty randomly selected records from the year 2017 were further analysed to assess compliance with NICE guidelines.
resultsBetween 2013 and 2017, the number of arthroscopies performed annually in five trusts dropped from 2028 to 1099. In the year 2017, 17.7% of patients with no mechanical symptoms and moderate-to-severe arthritis pre-operatively had arthroscopy.
conclusionKnee arthroscopy continues to be used as a treatment for osteoarthritis, against national guidelines. Whilst overall numbers are declining, further interventions, including implementation of high-quality conservative care is required to further eliminate unnecessary procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33611640What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.