Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33610545›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry

Molecular origins of reduced activity and binding commitment of processive cellulases and associated carbohydrate-binding proteins to cellulose III.

Shishir P S Chundawat, Bhargava Nemmaru, Markus Hackl, Sonia K Brady, Mark A Hilton, Madeline M Johnson, Sungrok Chang, Matthew J Lang, Hyun Huh, Sang-Hyuk Lee and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Acoustic force spectroscopy reveals subtle differences in cellulose unbinding behavior of carbohydrate-binding modules.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shishir P S ChundawatDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA. Electronic address: shishir.chundawat@rutgers.edu.
Bhargava NemmaruDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Markus HacklDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Sonia K BradyDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Mark A HiltonDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Madeline M JohnsonDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Sungrok ChangDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Matthew J LangDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Hyun HuhDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Sang-Hyuk LeeDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
John M YarbroughBiosciences Center, National Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, Colorado, USA.
Cesar A LópezTheoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA.
Sandrasegaram GnanakaranTheoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USVanderbilt University · USLos Alamos National Laboratory · USNational Laboratory of the Rockies · US

Funding

MOLECULAR BIOPHYSICS TRAINING PROGRAM AT VANDERBILTT32GM008320 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CHAZIN, WALTER J. · 1989 to 2023
$7.9M
Mechanism of Cellulose Synthesis and Transport Across Biological MembranesR01GM101001 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI ZIMMER, JOCHEN · 2012 to 2021
$3.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101001NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient enzymatic saccharification of cellulosic biomass into fermentable sugars can enable production of bioproducts like ethanol. Native crystalline cellulose, or cellulose I, is inefficiently processed via enzymatic hydrolysis but can be converted into the structurally distinct cellulose III allomorph that is processed via cellulase cocktails derived from Trichoderma reesei up to 20-fold faster. However, characterization of individual cellulases from T. reesei, like the processive exocellulase Cel7A, shows reduced binding and activity at low enzyme loadings toward cellulose III. To clarify this discrepancy, we monitored the single-molecule initial binding commitment and subsequent processive motility of Cel7A enzymes and associated carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs) on cellulose using optical tweezers force spectroscopy. We confirmed a 48% lower initial binding commitment and 32% slower processive motility of Cel7A on cellulose III, which we hypothesized derives from reduced binding affinity of the Cel7A binding domain CBM1. Classical CBM-cellulose pull-down assays, depending on the adsorption model fitted, predicted between 1.2- and 7-fold reduction in CBM1 binding affinity for cellulose III. Force spectroscopy measurements of CBM1-cellulose interactions, along with molecular dynamics simulations, indicated that previous interpretations of classical binding assay results using multisite adsorption models may have complicated analysis, and instead suggest simpler single-site models should be used. These findings were corroborated by binding analysis of other type-A CBMs (CBM2a, CBM3a, CBM5, CBM10, and CBM64) on both cellulose allomorphs. Finally, we discuss how complementary analytical tools are critical to gain insight into the complex mechanisms of insoluble polysaccharides hydrolysis by cellulolytic enzymes and associated carbohydrate-binding proteins.

Indexed as

AdsorptionCarrier ProteinsCatalytic DomainCellulaseCellulasesCelluloseCellulose 1,4-beta-CellobiosidaseHydrolysisHypocrealesMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein BindingTrichodermaCarrier ProteinsCellulaseCellulasesCelluloseCellulose 1,4-beta-Cellobiosidasecarbohydrate-active enzymescarbohydrate-binding proteinscellulasescelluloselignocellulosic biofuelsmolecular dynamicsoptical tweezers force spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID33610545
PMCPMC8010709
OpenAlexW3130930066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.