ArticleRevista Argentina de microbiologia
[Proposal for the control and mitigation of COVID-19 dissemination: strategic management of the disease].
Article in Revista Argentina de microbiologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid spread of COVID-19 throughout the world, has led most of the affected countries to close their borders and implement some form of lockdown. Six months after the pandemic started, many countries made decisions tending to relax the lockdown, although without a vaccine or treatment capable of confronting SARS-CoV-2 infection, the situation could be reversed at any time. In this context, the aim of this work was to propose a decision algorithm that will allow to optimize asymptomatic case detections and strategically manage quarantine to prevent the spread of the virus and drive the transition to a managed new normal. This tentative proposal was developed for optimizing and ordering the number of tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, analyzing composite samples (group analysis) combining with those samples individually taken from asymptomatic members of cohorts of interest. Cohorts were defined according to their critical role in society and/or their vulnerability. The algorithm includes variables such as cohort priority, number of cohort members in the analysis groups, intra-and intergroup contact, vulnerability to contagion due to the activity performed, and time elapsed since last testing. The proposed tool was illustrated with defined hypothetical cohorts, in which, for the sake of simplification, only one analysis group was considered. The application of this tool allowed to establish in a rational way a priority order to test critical groups in society. Furthermore, this tool would help to optimize resources, reducing the impact on a region's health, society, and economy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.