Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33610180›Full record

SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2021

The popliteomeniscal fascicles: from diagnosis to surgical repair: a systematic review of current literature.

Alessio D'Addona, Andrea Izzo, Giovanni Di Vico, Donato Rosa, Nicola Maffulli

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [A study on repair method of typeZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alessio D'AddonaA.O.U. Federico II, Department of Public Health, Section of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy. alessio.daddona@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8862-8489
Andrea IzzoA.O.U. Federico II, Department of Public Health, Section of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Giovanni Di VicoDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Clinica San Michele, Maddaloni, CE, Italy.
Donato RosaA.O.U. Federico II, Department of Public Health, Section of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Nicola MaffulliDepartment of Musculoskeletal Disorders, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPopliteomeniscal fascicles (PMF) are considered the posterolateral meniscocapsular extensions which connect the lateral meniscus to the edge of the tibia. PMFs disruption leads to hypermobility of the lateral meniscus with pain and locking sensation. Recognition and treatment of PMFs tear remain very challenging. The aim of this systematic review is to collect and analyse the articles concerning popliteomeniscal fascicle disruption from diagnosis to surgical approach.

methodsPubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and EMBASE were searched. Various combinations of the keywords "Popliteomeniscal Fascicles", "Lateral Meniscus", "Popliteal Hiatus", "Posterolateral Corner", "Tear" and "Surgical Repair" were used. The original literature search identified a total of 85 articles comprising of duplicates. The PRISMA guidilines were followed. Studies in English language and published in peer-reviewed journals were included. Articles with level of evidence I to IV were included

resultsA total of three articles were included in the qualitative analysis. All the articles included are retrospective case series, with a level of evidence IV. Studies concerning patients with pre-operative imaging MRI and clinical assessment, reporting surgical technique and clinical outcomes assessed by physical examination and/or subjective evaluation scales were analysed.

conclusionsMRI and the Figure-4 test allow to assess PMF tears pre-operatively. Arthroscopic evaluation constitutes the gold standard to confirm the diagnosis. Although surgery is considered resolutive for symptoms, there is still controversy about the most appropriate technique. Further higher quality studies are required.

Indexed as

HumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhysical ExaminationTibial Meniscus InjuriesTreatment OutcomeArthroscopyFasciclesLateral meniscusPopliteomeniscalPostero-lateral cornerRepair

Identifiers

PMID33610180
PMCPMC7896406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.