Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33609928›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2021

A deep learning approach to identify blepharoptosis by convolutional neural networks.

Ju-Yi Hung, Chandrashan Perera, Ke-Wei Chen, David Myung, Hsu-Kuang Chiu, Chiou-Shann Fuh, Cherng-Ru Hsu, Shu-Lang Liao, Andrea Lora Kossler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Developing an iOS application that uses machine learning for the automated diagnosis of blepharoptosis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ju-Yi HungOphthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States; Ophthalmology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chandrashan PereraOphthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States.
Ke-Wei ChenOphthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States; Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
David MyungOphthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States.
Hsu-Kuang ChiuComputer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States.
Chiou-Shann FuhComputer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Cherng-Ru HsuOphthalmology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Ophthalmology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shu-Lang LiaoOphthalmology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. Electronic address: liaosl89@ntu.edu.tw.
Andrea Lora KosslerOphthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States. Electronic address: akossler@stanford.edu.
Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute · USNational Taiwan University · TWStanford University · USTri-Service General Hospital · TW

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBlepharoptosis is a known cause of reversible vision loss. Accurate assessment can be difficult, especially amongst non-specialists. Existing automated techniques disrupt clinical workflow by requiring user input, or placement of reference markers. Neural networks are known to be effective in image classification tasks. We aim to develop an algorithm that can accurately identify blepharoptosis from a clinical photo.

methodsA total of 500 clinical photographs from patients with and without blepharoptosis were sourced from a tertiary ophthalmic center in Taiwan. Images were labeled by two oculoplastic surgeons, with an independent third oculoplastic surgeon to adjudicate disagreements. These images were used to train a series of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to ascertain the best CNN architecture for this particular task.

resultsOf the models that trained on the dataset, most were able to identify ptosis images with reasonable accuracy. We found the best performing model to use the DenseNet121 architecture without pre-training which achieved a sensitivity of 90.1 % with a specificity of 82.4 %, compared to the worst performing model which was used a Resnet34 architecture with pre-training, achieving a sensitivity of 74.1 %, and specificity of 63.6 %. Models with and without pre-training performed similarly (mean accuracy 82.6 % vs. 85.8 % respectively, p = 0.06), though models with pre-training took less time to train (1-minute vs. 16 min, p < 0.01).

conclusionsWe report the use of AI to accurately diagnose blepharoptosis from a clinical photograph with no external reference markers or user input requirement. Most current-generation CNN architectures performed reasonably on this task, with the DenseNet121, and Resnet18 architectures without pre-training performing best in our dataset.

Indexed as

BlepharoptosisDeep LearningAlgorithmsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerTaiwanArtificial intelligenceAutomated identificationBlepharoptosisDeep learning modelsHigh accuracyNovel medical image dataset

Identifiers

PMID33609928
PMCPMC8191181
OpenAlexW3127419420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.