ReviewExperimental eye research2021
Corneal biomechanics: Measurement and structural correlations.
Review in Experimental eye research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- Corneal biomechanical changes in patients with anterior chamber inflammation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Pooled it
- Advances in glaucoma biomechanics from 2000 to 2024: a bibliometric study and visualization analysis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
- Ex vivo, in vivo and in silico studies of corneal biomechanics: a systematic review.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Changes in corneal biomechanics in patients with glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Pooled it
- Intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanics in patients affected by myotonic dystrophy type 1.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Global spatiotemporal biomechanics using video swin transformer: multiscale validation and clinical impact for keratoconus suspects.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Corneal biomechanics with CORVIS-ST in post-keratoplasty corneas.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Wavelet time-frequency analysis enhances noise-resilient quantification of corneal wave velocity and natural frequency in optical coherence elastography.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Biomechanical Characterization of Central Corneal Region Using Inflation Test and its Application to Predicting Central Corneal Response Under Intraocular Pressure.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Intraocular pressure measurement in keratoconus: a narrative review.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Comparative corneal biomechanical changes after FS-LASIK and orthokeratology.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Article
- The Impact of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction on the Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A bioequivalent cornea cross-linking method using photo-initiators LAP and visible light.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- The influence of corneal biomechanical factors on surgically induced corneal astigmatism.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Method for Visualizing Corneal Dynamics Through Pixel Intensity Tracking.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- The impact of age, gender, and ocular parameters on corneal biomechanics in Chinese refractive candidates.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Exploring the Prevalence and Biological Features of Astigmatism in Primary School Children in Zibo City, China.Journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Corneal Biomechanical Changes Induced by Chronic Elevated Intraocular Pressure: Implications for Glaucoma Pathogenesis and Management.Journal of ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Responsive porous microneedles with riboflavin ocular microinjection capability for facilitating corneal crosslinking.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The characterization of corneal biomechanical properties has important implications for the management of ocular disease and prediction of surgical responses. Corneal refractive surgery outcomes, progression or stabilization of ectatic disease, and intraocular pressure determination are just examples of the many key clinical problems that depend highly upon corneal biomechanical characteristics. However, to date there is no gold standard measurement technique. Since the advent of a 1-dimensional (1D) air-puff based technique for measuring the corneal surface response in 2005, advances in clinical imaging technology have yielded increasingly sophisticated approaches to characterizing the biomechanical properties of the cornea. Novel analyses of 1D responses are expanding the clinical utility of commercially-available air-puff-based instruments, and other imaging modalities-including optical coherence elastography (OCE), Brillouin microscopy and phase-decorrelation ocular coherence tomography (PhD-OCT)-offer new opportunities for probing local biomechanical behavior in 3-dimensional space and drawing new inferences about the relationships between corneal structure, mechanical behavior, and corneal refractive function. These advances are likely to drive greater clinical adoption of in vivo biomechanical analysis and to support more personalized medical and surgical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.