ReviewThe Lancet. Neurology2021
New insights into atypical Alzheimer's disease in the era of biomarkers.
Review in The Lancet. Neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 410 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
410 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 627 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prion disease mimicking rapidly progressive Alzheimer disease: case series and systematic review.Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Exercise and Pain in Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease, Alzheimer's Disease, and Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Pooled it
- Network analysis of optimal deep or machine learning strategies for classification and detection of Alzheimer's disease based on MRI scanning.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of lecanemab monoclonal antibody in the treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia with and Without Concomitant Speech and Language Therapy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Neuropsychology review · 2025Pooled it
- Glutamatergic and GABAergic metabolite levels in Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Updated Appropriate Use Criteria for Amyloid and Tau PET: A Report from the Alzheimer's Association and Society for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Workgroup.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Updated appropriate use criteria for amyloid and tau PET: A report from the Alzheimer's Association and Society for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Workgroup.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Pooled it
- Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Alters Brain Communication Networks to Improve the Cognitive Function in Patients with Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment - A Clinical Trial.Current neuropharmacology · 2026Trial
- Hyperspectral retinal imaging to detect Alzheimer's disease in a memory clinic setting.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2025Trial
- Oxidative stress in neurodegeneration: from a simple insult to a dynamic regulator.Redox report : communications in free radical research · 2026Review
- Article
- Hearing Intervention for Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment: The CHOICE Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA neurology · 2026Article
- Atypical Alzheimer disease: a multi-axis framework toward defining heterogeneity.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
- Somatic mosaicism in the brain: linking development, ageing and neurodegeneration.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
- Advanced Eye Movement Features Measured by Quantitative Oculography as Candidate Biomarkers for Progressive Supranuclear Palsy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Eligibility for Anti-Amyloid Therapies in Patients With Biomarker-Confirmed Atypical Alzheimer Disease Phenotypes.Neurology · 2026Article
- Machine learning-derived Alzheimer's disease dimensions: neuroanatomical, cognitive, clinical, functional, and genetic risk heterogeneity signatures.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Operationalizing Alzheimer's disease trials in the era of targeted therapies.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Review
- Microbiota-gut-brain axis and bile acids-driven neuromodulation.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
350 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Most patients with Alzheimer's disease present with amnestic problems; however, a substantial proportion, over-represented in young-onset cases, have atypical phenotypes including predominant visual, language, executive, behavioural, or motor dysfunction. In the past, these individuals often received a late diagnosis; however, availability of CSF and PET biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease pathologies and incorporation of atypical forms of Alzheimer's disease into new diagnostic criteria increasingly allows them to be more confidently diagnosed early in their illness. This early diagnosis in turn allows patients to be offered tailored information, appropriate care and support, and individualised treatment plans. These advances will provide improved access to clinical trials, which often exclude atypical phenotypes. Research into atypical Alzheimer's disease has revealed previously unrecognised neuropathological heterogeneity across the Alzheimer's disease spectrum. Neuroimaging, genetic, biomarker, and basic science studies are providing key insights into the factors that might drive selective vulnerability of differing brain networks, with potential mechanistic implications for understanding typical late-onset Alzheimer's disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.