Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33609418›Full record

ArticleNursing open2021

Development and psychometric evaluation of a quality nursing care scale from nurses' perspective.

Ying Liu, Yupin Aungsuroch, Joko Gunawan, Liyan Sha, Tieying Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Concept Analysis of Quality Nursing Care.Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ying LiuSchool of Nursing, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1261-4213
Yupin AungsurochFaculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Joko GunawanFaculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6694-8679
Liyan ShaNursing Division Department, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Tieying ShiNursing Division Department, The First Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8599-3587

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo develop and evaluate psychometric property of quality nursing care scale (QNCS) from nurses' perspective in the Chinese context.

designA cross-sectional survey design.

methodsThis study was conducted in two phases. In Phase I, literature review and interviews were conducted to develop the items. In Phase II, content validity was evaluated by five experts. Construct validity was tested through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) among 302 nurses and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) among 510 nurses from October 2014 to January 2015. Additionally, internal consistency reliability was tested.

resultsThe EFA extracted six factors including staff characteristics, task-oriented activities, human-oriented activities, physical environment, patient outcomes and precondition. All six factors accounted for 74.78% of the total variance to explain quality nursing care. The modified measurement model of the final version of QNCS was supported by the CFA with 48 items in six dimensions. The internal consistency reliability of final QNCS was acceptable.

Indexed as

NursesNursing CareCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesinstrument developmentnursequality nursing carereliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID33609418
PMCPMC8186702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.