Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33609399›Full record

ArticleBJS open2021

Failure to rescue patients after emergency laparotomy for large bowel perforation: analysis of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA).

O Peacock, F Yanni, A Kuryba, D Cromwell, S Lockwood, I Anderson, R S Vohra, NELA Project Team

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Abdominal surgical trajectories associated with failure to rescue. A nationwide analysis.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2022
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

O PeacockPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
F YanniTrent Oesophago-Gastric Unit, Nottingham City Hospital Campus, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
A KurybaClinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK.
D CromwellClinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK.
S LockwoodColorectal Surgery Department, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
I AndersonUniversity of Manchester School of Medicine, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
R S VohraTrent Oesophago-Gastric Unit, Nottingham City Hospital Campus, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
NELA Project Team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPast studies have highlighted variation in in-hospital mortality rates among hospitals performing emergency laparotomy for large bowel perforation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether failure to rescue (FTR) contributes to this variability.

methodsPatients aged 18 years or over requiring surgery for large bowel perforation between 2013 and 2016 were extracted from the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) database. Information on complications were identified using linked Hospital Episode Statistics data and in-hospital deaths from the Office for National Statistics. The FTR rate was defined as the proportion of patients dying in hospital with a recorded complication, and was examined in hospitals grouped as having low, medium or high overall postoperative mortality.

resultsOverall, 6413 patients were included with 1029 (16.0 per cent) in-hospital deaths. Some 3533 patients (55.1 per cent) had at least one complication: 1023 surgical (16.0 per cent) and 3332 medical (52.0 per cent) complications. There were 22 in-hospital deaths following a surgical complication alone, 685 deaths following a medical complication alone, 150 deaths following both a surgical and medical complication, and 172 deaths with no recorded complication. The risk of in-hospital death was high among patients who suffered either type of complication (857 deaths in 3533 patients; FTR rate 24.3 per cent): 172 deaths followed a surgical complication (FTR-surgical rate 16.8 per cent) and 835 deaths followed a medical complication (FTR-medical rate of 25.1 per cent). After adjustment for patient characteristics and hospital factors, hospitals grouped as having low, medium or high overall postoperative mortality did not have different FTR rates (P = 0.770).

conclusionAmong patients having emergency laparotomy for large bowel perforation, efforts to reduce the risk of in-hospital death should focus on reducing avoidable complications. There was no evidence of variation in FTR rates across National Health Service hospitals in England.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEmergenciesEnglandFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIntestinal PerforationLaparotomyLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33609399
PMCPMC7896807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.