Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33609388›Full record

ArticleBJS open2021

Management of complex ventral hernias: results of an international survey.

L Knaapen, O Buyne, N Slater, B Matthews, H Goor, C Rosman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

L KnaapenDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
O BuyneDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
N SlaterDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
B MatthewsDepartment of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
H GoorDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
C RosmanDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLCarolinas Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe surgical treatment of patients with complex ventral hernias is challenging. The aim of this study was to present an international overview of expert opinions on current practice.

methodsA survey questionnaire was designed to investigate preoperative risk management, surgical approach and mesh choice in patients undergoing complex hernias repair, and treatment strategies for infected meshes. Geographical location of practice, experience and annual volumes of the surgeons were compared.

resultsOf 408 surgeons, 234 (57.4 per cent) were practising in the USA, 116 (28.4 per cent) in Europe, and 58 (14.2 per cent) in other countries. Some 412 of 418 surgeons (98.6 per cent) performed open repair and 322 of 416 (77.4 per cent) performed laparoscopic repair. Most recommended preoperative work-up/lifestyle changes such as smoking cessation (319 of 398, 80.2 per cent) and weight loss (254 of 399, 63.7 per cent), but the consequences of these strategies varied. American surgeons and less experienced surgeons were stricter. Antibiotics were given at least 1 h before surgery by 295 of 414 respondents (71.3 per cent). Synthetic and biological meshes were used equally in contaminated primary hernia repair, whereas for recurrent hernia repair synthetic mesh was used in a clean environment and biological or no mesh in a contaminated environment. American surgeons and surgeons with less experience preferred biological mesh in contaminated environments significantly more often. Percutaneous drainage and antibiotics were the first steps recommended in treating mesh infection. In the presence of sepsis, most surgeons favoured synthetic mesh explantation and further repair with biological mesh.

conclusionThere remains a paucity of good-quality evidence in dealing with these hernias, leading to variations in management. Patient optimization and issues related to mesh choice and infections require well designed prospective studies.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelSurgical MeshAdultAgedFemaleHealth Care SurveysHernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyHumansInternationalityMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'

Identifiers

PMID33609388
PMCPMC7893472
OpenAlexW3132972035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.