Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33609380›Full record

Observational studyBJS open2021

Practical model to identify liver transplant recipients at low risk of postoperative haemorrhage, bile leakage and ascites.

C Hobeika, F Cauchy, E Weiss, S Chopinet, A Sepulveda, F Dondero, L Khoy-Ear, B Grigoresco, S Dokmak, F Durand and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BJS open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05688137 (Abdominal Drainage in the Postoperative Period of Liver Transplantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05688137 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Abdominal Drainage in the Postoperative Period of Liver Transplantation (DRALIT): Multi-institutional Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Universitario Virgen de la ArrixacaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled365ConditionsLiver Transplant, Complications, DrainageArmsAbdominal drainage
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C HobeikaDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and Université de Paris, Clichy, France.
F CauchyDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and Université de Paris, Clichy, France.
E WeissDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and Université de Paris, Clichy, France.
S ChopinetDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and Université de Paris, Clichy, France.
A SepulvedaDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and Université de Paris, Clichy, France.
F DonderoDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and Université de Paris, Clichy, France.
L Khoy-EarDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and Université de Paris, Clichy, France.
B GrigorescoDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and Université de Paris, Clichy, France.
S DokmakDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and Université de Paris, Clichy, France.
F DurandDepartment of Hepatology, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and Université de Paris, Clichy, France.
B Le RoyDepartment of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nord Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest en Jarez, France.
C Paugam-BurtzDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and Université de Paris, Clichy, France.
O SoubraneDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and Université de Paris, Clichy, France.
Université Paris Cité · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to identify a subgroup of recipients at low risk of haemorrhage, bile leakage and ascites following liver transplantation (LT).

methodsFactors associated with significant postoperative ascites (more than 10 ml/kg on postoperative day 5), bile leakage and haemorrhage after LT were identified using three separate multivariable analyses in patients who had LT in 2010-2019. A model predicting the absence of all three outcomes was created and validated internally using bootstrap procedure.

resultsOverall, 944 recipients underwent LT. Rates of ascites, bile leakage and haemorrhage were 34.9, 7.7 and 6.0 per cent respectively. The 90-day mortality rate was 7.0 per cent. Partial liver graft (relative risk (RR) 1.31; P = 0.021), intraoperative ascites (more than 10 ml/kg suctioned after laparotomy) (RR 2.05; P = 0.001), malnutrition (RR 1.27; P = 0.006), portal vein thrombosis (RR 1.56; P = 0.024) and intraoperative blood loss greater than 1000 ml (RR 1.39; P = 0.003) were independently associated with postoperative ascites and/or bile leak and/or haemorrhage, and were introduced in the model. The model was well calibrated and predicted the absence of all three outcomes with an area under the curve of 0.76 (P = 0.001). Of the 944 patients, 218 (23.1 per cent) fulfilled the five criteria of the model, and 9.6 per cent experienced postoperative ascites (RR 0.22; P = 0.001), 1.8 per cent haemorrhage (RR 0.21; P = 0.033), 4.1 per cent bile leak (RR 0.54; P = 0.048), 40.4 per cent severe complications (RR 0.70; P = 0.001) and 1.4 per cent 90-day mortality (RR 0.13; P = 0.004).

conclusionA practical model has been provided to identify patients at low risk of ascites, bile leakage and haemorrhage after LT; these patients could potentially qualify for inclusion in non-abdominal drainage protocols.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAdultAnastomotic LeakAscitesBile Duct DiseasesFemaleFranceHumansLiver TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative HemorrhageRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID33609380
PMCPMC7893463
OpenAlexW3133073435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.