Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33609362›Full record

ArticleCarcinogenesis2021

Proteomic analyses identify major vault protein as a prognostic biomarker for fatal prostate cancer.

Håkon Ramberg, Elin Richardsen, Gustavo A de Souza, Mehrdad Rakaee, Maria Ekman Stensland, Peder Rustøen Braadland, Ståle Nygård, Olov Ögren, Ingrid J Guldvik, Viktor Berge and 3 more

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Carcinogenesis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Human Vault RNAs: Exploring Their Potential Role in Cellular Metabolism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Literature-based predictions of Mendelian disease therapies.American journal of human genetics · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Major Vault Protein (MVP) Associated WithFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Håkon RambergDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5434-6029
Elin RichardsenDepartment of Medical Biology, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Gustavo A de SouzaDepartment of Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Mehrdad RakaeeDepartment of Medical Biology, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Maria Ekman StenslandDepartment of Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Peder Rustøen BraadlandDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ståle NygårdDepartment of Tumorbiology, Bioinformatic Core Facility, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Olov ÖgrenDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ingrid J GuldvikDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Viktor BergeDepartment of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Aud SvindlandInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Kristin A TaskénDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Sigve AndersenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The demographic shift toward an older population will increase the number of prostate cancer cases. A challenge in the treatment of prostate cancer is to avoid undertreatment of patients at high risk of progression following curative treatment. These men can benefit from early salvage treatment. An explorative cohort consisting of tissue from 16 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy, and were either alive or had died from prostate cancer within 10 years postsurgery, was analyzed by mass spectrometry analysis. Following proteomic and bioinformatic analyses, major vault protein (MVP) was identified as a putative prognostic biomarker. A publicly available tissue proteomics dataset and a retrospective cohort of 368 prostate cancer patients were used for validation. The prognostic value of the MVP was verified by scoring immunohistochemical staining of a tissue microarray. High level of MVP was associated with more than 4-fold higher risk for death from prostate cancer (hazard ratio = 4.41, 95% confidence interval: 1.45-13.38; P = 0.009) in a Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessments Post-surgical (CAPRA-S) score and perineural invasion. Decision curve analyses suggested an improved standardized net benefit, ranging from 0.06 to 0.18, of adding MVP onto CAPRA-S score. This observation was confirmed by receiver operator characteristics curve analyses for the CAPRA-S score versus CAPRA-S and MVP score (area under the curve: 0.58 versus 0.73). From these analyses, one can infer that MVP levels in combination with CAPRA-S score might add onto established risk parameters to identify patients with lethal prostate cancer.

Indexed as

ProteomicsBiomarkers, TumorFatal OutcomeGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMajor Vault ProteinMaleProstatic NeoplasmsVault Ribonucleoprotein ParticlesBiomarkers, TumorMajor Vault ProteinVault Ribonucleoprotein Particles

Identifiers

PMID33609362
PMCPMC8163044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.