Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33609339›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2021

Realistic High-Resolution Body Computed Tomography Image Synthesis by Using Progressive Growing Generative Adversarial Network: Visual Turing Test.

Ho Young Park, Hyun-Jin Bae, Gil-Sun Hong, Minjee Kim, JiHye Yun, Sungwon Park, Won Jung Chung, NamKug Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ho Young ParkDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine & Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2318-9806
Hyun-Jin BaeDepartment of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine & Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5134-5517
Gil-Sun HongDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine & Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0068-9413
Minjee KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0035-4437
JiHye YunDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine & Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5233-6687
Sungwon ParkDepartment of Health Screening and Promotion Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine & Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7032-8496
Won Jung ChungDepartment of Health Screening and Promotion Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine & Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3323-2508
NamKug KimDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine & Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3438-2217
Ulsan College · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenerative adversarial network (GAN)-based synthetic images can be viable solutions to current supervised deep learning challenges. However, generating highly realistic images is a prerequisite for these approaches.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate and validate the unsupervised synthesis of highly realistic body computed tomography (CT) images by using a progressive growing GAN (PGGAN) trained to learn the probability distribution of normal data.

methodsWe trained the PGGAN by using 11,755 body CT scans. Ten radiologists (4 radiologists with <5 years of experience [Group I], 4 radiologists with 5-10 years of experience [Group II], and 2 radiologists with >10 years of experience [Group III]) evaluated the results in a binary approach by using an independent validation set of 300 images (150 real and 150 synthetic) to judge the authenticity of each image.

resultsThe mean accuracy of the 10 readers in the entire image set was higher than random guessing (1781/3000, 59.4% vs 1500/3000, 50.0%, respectively; P<.001). However, in terms of identifying synthetic images as fake, there was no significant difference in the specificity between the visual Turing test and random guessing (779/1500, 51.9% vs 750/1500, 50.0%, respectively; P=.29). The accuracy between the 3 reader groups with different experience levels was not significantly different (Group I, 696/1200, 58.0%; Group II, 726/1200, 60.5%; and Group III, 359/600, 59.8%; P=.36). Interreader agreements were poor (κ=0.11) for the entire image set. In subgroup analysis, the discrepancies between real and synthetic CT images occurred mainly in the thoracoabdominal junction and in the anatomical details.

conclusionsThe GAN can synthesize highly realistic high-resolution body CT images that are indistinguishable from real images; however, it has limitations in generating body images of the thoracoabdominal junction and lacks accuracy in the anatomical details.

Indexed as

computed tomographygenerative adversarial networksynthetic body imagesunsupervised deep learningvisual Turing test

Identifiers

PMID33609339
PMCPMC8077702
OpenAlexW3129224130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.