ArticleBioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy2021
New Insight on the Safety of Erenumab: An Analysis of Spontaneous Reports of Adverse Events Recorded in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Database.
Article in BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Post-marketing safety of CGRP monoclonal antibodies and gepants: A systematic review of spontaneous reporting system data.Headache · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness and safety of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies for migraine in patients over 65 years: a systematic review.Pain management · 2025Pooled it
- A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled pilot study to assess the efficacy of erenumab in individuals with temporomandibular disorder.Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2025Trial
- Hair loss in the era of CGRP inhibition: emerging evidence, mechanisms, and clinical implications.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- No Increase in Blood Pressure Assessed With the 24-h Holter Monitoring in Patients With Episodic Migraine During Early Treatment With Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies: A Prospective Observational Study (SAFHYPER).European journal of neurology · 2025Observational
- Article
- Disproportionality analysis of reslizumab based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2024Article
- Review
- Ten open questions in migraine prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies blocking the calcitonin-gene related peptide pathway: a narrative review.The journal of headache and pain · 2023Review
- Adverse event reporting of four anti-Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies for migraine prevention: a real-world study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- First Report of Symmetrical Drug-related Intertriginous and Flexural Exanthema (SDRIFE or Baboon Syndrome) After Erenumab Application for Migraine Prevention.Pain and therapy · 2022Article
- Safety and tolerability of erenumab in individuals with episodic or chronic migraine across age groups: a pooled analysis of placebo-controlled trials.The journal of headache and pain · 2022Article
- Cardiovascular Disease and Migraine: Are the New Treatments Safe?Current pain and headache reports · 2022Review
- Myocardial infarction associated with erenumab: A case report.Pharmacotherapy · 2022Article
- A real-world study of acute and preventive medication use, adherence, and persistence in patients prescribed fremanezumab in the United States.The journal of headache and pain · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThe aim of this article was to provide an overview of adverse events reported for erenumab in post-marketing through the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and perform a disproportionality analysis with other drugs used for acute or preventative treatment of migraine as controls.
methodsFAERS was screened from the first quarter of 2018 to the second quarter of 2020 (latest data update 30 June 2020). Clinical and demographic characteristics of cases were described along with the seriousness and outcome of adverse events. Disproportionality analyses were performed using the reporting odds ratio (ROR).
resultsIn total, 23,312 cases were reported during the study period, 67.0% by consumers. Cases in the age range 18-64 years (10,922 cases; 45.8%), in female sex (15,099 cases; 64.8%), and with adverse events that were classified as non-serious (19,626 cases; 84.2%) were the most prevalent in the database. After the exclusion of duplicates, 146 fatal cases were identified. A total of 1303 unlabeled adverse events were reported, of which 49 had statistically significant disproportionality of reporting in comparison with other drugs used for acute or preventative treatment of migraine. Identified disproportionality signals included alopecia, depression, anxiety, myocardial infarction, increased heart rate, pulmonary embolism, weight alteration, insomnia, tinnitus, and influenza-like symptoms. Injection-site reactions (labeled events) were co-reported with errors in administration procedures.
conclusionAdverse events reported during the first 2 years of post-marketing surveillance were mostly non-serious and with a favorable prognosis. However, new safety aspects emerged for which further studies are needed to confirm the associations, prioritizing unlabeled events with consistent disproportionality signals (e.g., emerging in at least 4 out of 6 analyses).
Indexed as
Identifiers
33609278What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.