Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33609248›Full record

ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2021

Secondary AML Emerging After Therapy with Hypomethylating Agents: Outcomes, Prognostic Factors, and Treatment Options.

Daniel R Richardson, Steven D Green, Matthew C Foster, Joshua F Zeidner

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel R RichardsonLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Houpt Building, Chapel Hill, NC, #7305, USA.
Steven D GreenMelvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Matthew C FosterLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Houpt Building, Chapel Hill, NC, #7305, USA.
Joshua F ZeidnerLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Houpt Building, Chapel Hill, NC, #7305, USA. Joshua_Zeidner@med.unc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9014-1514
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USIndiana University Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewSecondary AML (s-AML) encompasses a distinct subgroup of AML with either therapy-related AML or AML arising from preexisting myeloid neoplasms. Despite recent advances in the treatment armamentarium of AML, outcomes remain poor in s-AML. The purpose of this review is to highlight distinct characteristics, prognostic factors, and treatment options for patients with s-AML. Further, we focus on a distinctly poor-risk subgroup of s-AML with previous exposure to hypomethylating agents (HMAs) and describe ongoing clinical trials in this patient population. RECENT

findingsCPX-351 (liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine) is the first drug approved for s-AML and represents an advancement in the management of fit patients with this subtype of AML. Despite incremental improvement in remission rates and survival, long-term survival remains poor. Patients who have received prior HMAs for antecedent MDS rarely benefit from CPX-351 or other cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens. The approval of venetoclax in combination with azacitidine has led to a paradigm shift in the management of newly diagnosed older unfit AML patients; however, patients with s-AML and prior HMA therapy were excluded from the landmark randomized phase 3 study. Several early phase clinical trials with both low- and high-intensity therapies are ongoing for s-AML patients, though prior HMA exposure limits inclusion in many of these studies that include HMAs. Patients with s-AML previously treated with an HMA have dismal outcomes with standard therapeutic options and are under-represented in clinical trials. Trials investigating novel therapeutic options in this population are critically needed.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsAzacitidineBenzimidazolesBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicCytarabineDaunorubicinGemtuzumabHumansInduction ChemotherapyLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMolecular Targeted TherapyPhenylurea CompoundsPrognosisSulfonamidesAntineoplastic AgentsAzacitidineBenzimidazolesBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicCPX-351CytarabineDaunorubicinGemtuzumabglasdegibPhenylurea CompoundsSulfonamidesvenetoclaxAcute myeloid leukemiaClinical trialsCPX-351Hypomethylating agentsSecondary AMLVenetoclax

Identifiers

PMID33609248
OpenAlexW3133178773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.