Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33609222›Full record

ReviewMolecular diversity2022

Cross-coupling reactions towards the synthesis of natural products.

Shaheera Tabassum, Ameer Fawad Zahoor, Sajjad Ahmad, Razia Noreen, Samreen Gul Khan, Hamad Ahmad

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular diversity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. TiOMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shaheera TabassumDepartment of Chemistry, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Ameer Fawad ZahoorDepartment of Chemistry, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan. fawad.zahoor@gcuf.edu.pk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2127-8848
Sajjad AhmadDepartment of Chemistry, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, Faisalabad Campus, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Razia NoreenDepartment of Biochemistry, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Samreen Gul KhanDepartment of Chemistry, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Hamad AhmadDepartment of Chemistry, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cross-coupling reactions are powerful synthetic tools for the formation of remarkable building blocks of many naturally occurring molecules, polymers and biologically active compounds. These reactions have brought potent transformations in chemical and pharmaceutical disciplines. In this review, we have focused on the use of cross-coupling reactions such as Suzuki, Negishi, Heck, Sonogashira and Stille in the total synthesis of some natural products of recent years (2016-2020). A short introduction of mentioned cross-coupling reactions along with highlighted aspects of natural products has been stated in separate sections. Additionally, few examples of natural products via incorporation of more than one type of cross-coupling reaction have also been added to demonstrate the importance of these reactions in organic synthesis.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsCatalysisChemistry Techniques, SyntheticMolecular StructureBiological ProductsAlkaloidsC–C bondCross-couplingNatural productsTerpenoids

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.