Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33609181›Full record

ReviewArchives of dermatological research2022

Review and reappraisal of assessment parameters of second intention healing after Mohs micrographic surgery.

Gabrielle Schwartzman, Alexander M Cartron, Amor Khachemoune

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of dermatological research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Fractional COLasers in medical science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gabrielle SchwartzmanSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Alexander M CartronDepartment of Dermatology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Amor KhachemouneDepartment of Dermatology, State University of New York Downstate, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 800 Poly Place, Brooklyn, NY, 11209, USA. amorkh@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1622-1097

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is used to remove cutaneous tumors in cosmetically sensitive anatomic areas. Surgeons can provide several reconstructive options to patients following tumor removal, including primary closure, skin grafts, local, regional or free flaps, and secondary intention healing (SIH). Notably, with the advancement of surgical and reconstructive techniques, the use of second intention healing has declined and may be underutilized. This review aims to critically evaluate the literature regarding indications, anatomical considerations, advantages, and complications of second intention wound healing following Mohs surgery. We also offer reappraisal of SIH following MMS to promote evidence-based postoperative care.

Indexed as

Wound HealingHumansMohs SurgerySkin NeoplasmsGranulationMohs micrographic surgerySecond intention healingWound healing

Identifiers

PMID33609181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.