Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33609154›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2021

Adjuvant chemotherapy after severe myelotoxicity during chemoradiation phase in malignant gliomas. Is it feasibile? Results from AINO study (Italian Association for Neuro-Oncology).

Veronica Villani, Elena Anghileri, Luca Prosperini, Giuseppe Lombardi, Roberta Rudà, Paola Gaviani, Simona Rizzato, Gaetano Lanzetta, Alessandra Fabi, Claudia Scaringi and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Veronica VillaniNeuro-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy. veronica.villani@ifo.gov.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8769-9966
Elena AnghileriMolecular Neuroncology Unit Fondazione IRCSS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
Luca ProsperiniDepartment of Neurosciences, S. Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe LombardiDepartment of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Roberta RudàDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Paola GavianiNeuro-Oncology Unit Fondazione IRCSS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
Simona RizzatoDepartment of Oncology, Department of Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy.
Gaetano LanzettaOncology Department, Istituto Neurotraumatologico Italiano, Grottaferrata, RM, Italy.
Alessandra FabiPhase 1 Unit and Precision Medicine-IRCSS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Claudia ScaringiRadiation Oncology Unit, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, San Pietro Hospital FBF, Rome, Italy.
Edoardo PronelloDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Giorgia SimonettiNeuro-Oncology Unit Fondazione IRCSS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
Giada TargatoDepartment of Oncology, Department of Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy.
Andrea PaceNeuro-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalignant gliomas (MG) are aggressive brain tumours in adults. The standard of care is concurrent radiation plus temozolomide (TMZ) [chemo-radiotherapy (CRT)] followed by TMZ maintenance up to 6 months. TMZ is considered to have a low toxicity profile, but several studies reported occurrence of severe myelosuppression, especially during the concomitant phase. Toxicity may be prolonged, thus treatment should be discontinued. PURPOSE: To evaluate the risk of recurrente myelotoxicity during adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in patients who recovered from severe myelotoxicity during CRT.

methodsWe retrospectively collected data on patients with MG who developed and recovered from severe myelotoxicity during CRT from eight Italian neuro-oncology centers.

resultsWe included 87 patients. Histology was Glioblastoma (GBM) in 78 patients (89.7%); 60% of patients were female. After myelotoxicity recovery, 54 (62%) received treatment. The majority of them (82%, n = 44) received adjuvant TMZ and 18% (n = 10) others treatments. Out of 44 patients who received adjuvant TMZ, 34% experienced the re-occurrence of grade 3-4 myelotoxicity which required permanent CT discontinuation in 6 (13%) cases. Patients who received TMZ or other treatments had longer overall (OS) (adjusted HR 0.46, p = 0.008) and progression free survival (PFS) (adjusted HR 0.57, p = 0.034) than those who remained untreated.

conclusionOur study suggests that after severe myelotoxicity the majority of patients received treatment, particularly with TMZ. Only a fraction of patients experienced toxicity recurrence, suggesting that TMZ is well tolerated and had an impact on PFS and OS.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaGliomaAdultAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingChemoradiotherapyChemotherapy, AdjuvantDacarbazineFemaleHumansItalyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingDacarbazineAdjuvant chemotherapy (CT)Concomitant chemo-radiotherapy (CRT)Hematological toxicityMalignant glioma (MG)Temozolomide (TMZ)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.