Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33609150›Full record

ReviewKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2022

Limited evidence for biological treatment measures for cartilage and tendon injuries of the shoulder.

Lucca Lacheta, Sepp Braun

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. External stimulation: A potential therapeutic strategy for tendon-bone healing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Strategies for promoting tendon-bone healing: Current status and prospects.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Lucca LachetaCenter for Musculosceletal Surgery, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sepp BraunGelenkpunkt, Sports and Joint Surgery Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. s.braun@gelenkpunkt.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8865-2606
Center for Orthopaedics · USCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo critically review the available literature on the usage of biologics to treat cartilage and tendon injuries of the shoulder.

methodsFour different databases were searched in January 2020 for studies reporting data on bone marrow stimulation, autologous chondrocyte implantation, platelet-rich plasma, autologous concentrated serum, and bone marrow aspirate concentrate for the treatment of cartilage and/or tendon injuries of the shoulder. Prospective, retrospective, cohort and case-control studies as well as case series, systematic reviews and laboratory studies (involving human tissue) were included. Cadaveric or animal studies were excluded. Findings were summarized and an expert opinion on trends was provided.

resultsAlthough there is limited literature available on biologics in cartilage lesions of the shoulder, the advancement from micro- to nanofracture, that is well established for the treatment of cartilage lesions in the knee, may be the next step in the treatment of shoulder lesions as well. The high rate of failure and therefore the complexity of tendon healing following rotator cuff repair has led to a rising interest in biologic augmentation such as platelet-rich plasma and stem cells to enhance tendon-bone-healing and to decrease the prevalence of failure. Despite the increase in publications, there exists a huge heterogeneity of content, quality, and quantity of among studies and their processing methods reporting the use of platelet-rich plasma in rotator cuff repair.

conclusionConclusions from individual studies cannot be generalized. Currently, no evidence supports that platelet-rich plasma provides clinical benefits in rotator cuff repair. Similar is reported for microfracture in rotator cuff repair, however, despite no clinical benefits, microfracture has shown to reduce the appearance of structural failures. Although some evidence exists for the use of stem cells form bone marrow aspirate concentrate, results from large case series are still lacking. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsFractures, StressPlatelet-Rich PlasmaRotator Cuff InjuriesTendon InjuriesAnimalsCartilageHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesRotator CuffShoulderTendonsBiological ProductsBiological treatmentCartilage lesionCell therapyShoulderTendon injury

Identifiers

PMID33609150
OpenAlexW3131653999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.