Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33608620›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Incidence and remission of aeroallergen sensitization in adults in Northern Finland: 15 years longitudinal study.

Anna Karoliina Haarala, Suvi-Päivikki Sinikumpu, Eeva Vaaramo, Jari Jokelainen, Markku Timonen, Juha Auvinen, Juha Pekkanen, Jussi Lampi, Laura Huilaja

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Landscape of Aeroallergen Sensitization in Asia.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Review
  3. Body Weight and Allergic Asthma: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anna Karoliina HaaralaPEDEGO Research Unit, PEDEGO Research Group, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Oulu and Medical Research Center, University of Oulu, Aapistie 5A, 90029, Oulu, Finland.
Suvi-Päivikki SinikumpuPEDEGO Research Unit, PEDEGO Research Group, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Oulu and Medical Research Center, University of Oulu, Aapistie 5A, 90029, Oulu, Finland.
Eeva VaaramoInfrastructure for Population Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Jari JokelainenInfrastructure for Population Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Markku TimonenCenter for Life Course Health Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Juha AuvinenCenter for Life Course Health Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Juha PekkanenDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Jussi LampiDepartment of Health Security, Environmental Health, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Kuopio, Finland.
Laura HuilajaPEDEGO Research Unit, PEDEGO Research Group, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Oulu and Medical Research Center, University of Oulu, Aapistie 5A, 90029, Oulu, Finland. laura.huilaja@oulu.fi.
University of Oulu · FIOulu University Hospital · FIFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies on the longitudinal changes in sensitization to aeroallergens in adult populations are sparse. The aim was to evaluate changes in sensitization to aeroallergens [birch, timothy, cat and house dust mite (HDM)] in an unselected adult population aged from 31 to 46 years. Data were gathered from a cohort of adults (Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966) who had been skin prick tested (SPT) with birch, timothy, cat and HDM allergens at the age of 31 years and at age 46 (n = 5484 and 5373 respectively). Data from both time points were available for 3409 participants, who made up the cohort of the longitudinal study. The overall prevalence of sensitization to any of the selected allergens was 30.3% (n = 1661) in 31-year-olds and 30.7% (n = 1649) in 46-year-olds. In general, men were more sensitized (P < 0.001) and also had more polysensitization (P < 0.001) compared to women. In longitudinal sub-population incidence of sensitization was 7.1%. Birch was the most prevalent new sensitizer, however, the difference was not statistically significant when compared to cat. We conclude that new sensitization, demonstrated by positive findings in SPT, can still occur in middle age and this should be taken into account when managing allergic manifestations in adults as sensitization can be considered the first step in developing clinical allergy.

Indexed as

AerosolsAdultAge FactorsAllergensDisease SusceptibilityFemaleFinlandHumansHypersensitivityImmunizationIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPrevalencePublic Health SurveillanceAerosolsAllergens

Identifiers

PMID33608620
PMCPMC7895822
OpenAlexW3132572174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.