Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33608544›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Innate immune evasion revealed in a colorectal zebrafish xenograft model.

Vanda Póvoa, Cátia Rebelo de Almeida, Mariana Maia-Gil, Daniel Sobral, Micaela Domingues, Mayra Martinez-Lopez, Miguel de Almeida Fuzeta, Carlos Silva, Ana Rita Grosso, Rita Fior

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Small Fish, Big Answers: Zebrafish and the Molecular Drivers of Metastasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vanda PóvoaChampalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Cátia Rebelo de AlmeidaChampalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Mariana Maia-GilChampalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1227-6592
Daniel SobralUCIBIO, Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal.
Micaela DominguesChampalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8976-9689
Mayra Martinez-LopezChampalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9149-3960
Miguel de Almeida FuzetaChampalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Carlos SilvaChampalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana Rita GrossoUCIBIO, Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6974-4209
Rita FiorChampalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal. rita.fior@research.fchampalimaud.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5550-2428
Champalimaud Foundation · PTUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer immunoediting is a dynamic process of crosstalk between tumor cells and the immune system. Herein, we explore the fast zebrafish xenograft model to investigate the innate immune contribution to this process. Using multiple breast and colorectal cancer cell lines and zAvatars, we find that some are cleared (regressors) while others engraft (progressors) in zebrafish xenografts. We focus on two human colorectal cancer cells derived from the same patient that show contrasting engraftment/clearance profiles. Using polyclonal xenografts to mimic intra-tumor heterogeneity, we demonstrate that SW620_progressors can block clearance of SW480_regressors. SW480_regressors recruit macrophages and neutrophils more efficiently than SW620_progressors; SW620_progressors however, modulate macrophages towards a pro-tumoral phenotype. Genetic and chemical suppression of myeloid cells indicates that macrophages and neutrophils play a crucial role in clearance. Single-cell-transcriptome analysis shows a fast subclonal selection, with clearance of regressor subclones associated with IFN/Notch signaling and escaper-expanded subclones with enrichment of IL10 pathway. Overall, our work opens the possibility of using zebrafish xenografts as living biomarkers of the tumor microenvironment.

Indexed as

Immune EvasionAnimalsCell Line, TumorColonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsDisease Models, AnimalHeterograftsHomeodomain ProteinsHumansImmunity, InnateMacrophagesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLTumor MicroenvironmentXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysHomeodomain ProteinsRAG-1 protein

Identifiers

PMID33608544
PMCPMC7895829
OpenAlexW3129445930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.