Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33608533›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Bifurcation in brain dynamics reveals a signature of conscious processing independent of report.

Claire Sergent, Martina Corazzol, Ghislaine Labouret, François Stockart, Mark Wexler, Jean-Rémi King, Florent Meyniel, Daniel Pressnitzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Reappraising intuitions about consciousness.Frontiers in psychology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Behavioral, experiential, and physiological signatures of mind blanking.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Claire SergentUniversité de Paris, INCC UMR 8002, 75006, Paris, France. claire.sergent@u-paris.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-6011-5780
Martina Corazzol *Université de Paris, INCC UMR 8002, 75006, Paris, France.
Ghislaine Labouret *Université de Paris, INCC UMR 8002, 75006, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7285-5540
François StockartUniversité de Paris, INCC UMR 8002, 75006, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6945-0638
Mark WexlerUniversité de Paris, INCC UMR 8002, 75006, Paris, France.
Jean-Rémi KingLaboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs, Département d'études cognitives, École normale supérieure, PSL University, CNRS, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2121-170X
Florent MeynielCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, CEA, INSERM, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin Center, Gif/Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6992-678X
Daniel PressnitzerLaboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs, Département d'études cognitives, École normale supérieure, PSL University, CNRS, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4744-5165

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An outstanding challenge for consciousness research is to characterize the neural signature of conscious access independently of any decisional processes. Here we present a model-based approach that uses inter-trial variability to identify the brain dynamics associated with stimulus processing. We demonstrate that, even in the absence of any task or behavior, the electroencephalographic response to auditory stimuli shows bifurcation dynamics around 250-300 milliseconds post-stimulus. Namely, the same stimulus gives rise to late sustained activity on some trials, and not on others. This late neural activity is predictive of task-related reports, and also of reports of conscious contents that are randomly sampled during task-free listening. Source localization further suggests that task-free conscious access recruits the same neural networks as those associated with explicit report, except for frontal executive components. Studying brain dynamics through variability could thus play a key role for identifying the core signatures of conscious access, independent of report.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultAuditory PerceptionBehaviorBrainCognitive NeuroscienceConsciousnessElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33608533
PMCPMC7895979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.